Prayer Focus
Click here to watch THE HOPE on-line!

Idiocracy also known as “Idiocracia,” “26 seiki seinen: Bakatachi,” “3001,” “Absurdistán,” “Hülyék paradicsoma,” “Idiokracja,” “Idiokratija,” “Idioluutio,” “Idioti budućnosti,” “Idiotizem,” “Idiotrepubliken,” “La idiocracia,” “Planet stupid,” “Terra de Idiotas”

MPAA Rating: R-Rating (MPAA) for language and sex-related humor.
Not recommended
Add to your list?
View My Movie List
Moviemaking Quality:

Primary Audience:
Adults
Genre:
Sci-Fi Action Adventure Comedy
Length:
1 hr. 24 min.
Year of Release:
2006
USA Release:
September 1, 2006 (limited)
DVD: January 9, 2007
Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation click photos to ENLARGE Copyright, 20th Century Fox Copyright, 20th Century Fox
Relevant Issues
Human Evolution

Does the DNA similarity between chimps and humans prove a common ancestry? Answer

Who’s who and what’s what in the world of “missing” links? Answer

Is there fossil evidence of “missing links” between humans and apes? Did ancient humans live millions of years ago? Answer

Are humans evolving upward or DOWNWARD?

Click to learn about ADAM, the first manWhat was Adam, the first man, really like? Answer (This answer is in our children’s section, but it’s written on a level that adults can enjoy.)

More about the origin of man

Featuring: Luke WilsonJoe Bauers
Maya RudolphRita
Dax Shepard … Frito
Terry Crews … President Camacho (Terry Alan Crews)
Anthony 'Citric' Campos … Secretary of Defense
David Herman … Secretary of State
Sonny Castillo … Prosecutor
Kevin McAfee … Bailiff (Kevin S. McAfee)
Robert Musgrave … Sgt. Keller
See all »
Director: Mike Judge
Producer: Elysa Koplovitz Dutton—“Everything, Everything” (2017)
Mike Judge
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Ternion Pictures
Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Here’s what the distributor says about their film: “Meet Private Joe Bowers (Luke Wilson), the definition of ‘average American.’ He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. But when a top-secret government hibernation experiment goes awry, Bowers awakens in the year 2505 to find a society so dumbed-down by mass commercialism and mindless TV programming that he's become the smartest guy on the planet. He becomes a close advisor to the president of the United States President Comacho (Terry Alan Crews). Now it's up to an average Joe to get human evolution back on track.”


Viewer CommentsSend your comments
Comments below:
Positive
Positive—I liked the 180 switch on the future of mankind. Being a sci-fi buff, it is not hard to recognize that, generally speaking, movies about the future are filled with high tech gadgets, futuristic vehicles, intelligent science-minded people supposively having solved all the problems of mankind. With “Idiocracy” we get the opposite and perhaps a more realistic dose of where our culture is headed. Although this movie exaggerates how unintelligent people of the future might become, there is some underlying truth. No one can deny the dumbing down of the English language within the last 100 years. If we followed that same curve, assuming it progressed as it has now, it could very well be as the people were in this movie. A vocabulary of about 100 words and an IQ of 30.

I really liked the play on Evolution in the film. Evolution is generally stated to be increasing in complexity, against the norm of the laws of thermodynamics. YET, in this movie, it is really shown that “survival of the fittest” is often not “survival of the smartest”, but rather the “C” student or trailer park resident has far more children than that liberal “A” student, who thinks he has all the answers. In the end, the smart die off and only the trailer park or inner city folk remain. See all »
My Ratings: Average / 3
Anthony Woodcock, age 31
Neutral
Neutral—Tough call for this one. Definitely not for the kids, or for the squeamish. It has some solid, laugh-out-loud moments, and an intelligent message (even though it is presented unintelligibly). An enigma of a film, it somehow willingly condemns itself. There is no Christian message, and it is laced with lewd jokes, yet it has an air of respect for the audience that many other comedy films lack, and a cinematic polish uncommon for the genre that gives it a sense of authority.

There is no nudity but lots of sexual dialog and imagery, as well as profanity including quite a few uses of God’s name in vain (which is quite a few too many). Overall, if you are on the fence about seeing this, then do not see it. If you are determined to see it, try to look at it as a warning message; see what a world utterly rejecting God can look like.
My Ratings: Extremely Offensive / 5
Adam, age 24
Neutral—I know dark-comedy, and usually I’m a fan, but this time it was just too much. As far as quality goes, the filming wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good either. The storyline is less than outstanding, which is why this will get a three.

Moral objections? I counted slightly over 75 f’s and I lost count of s’s (which in idiot-land, is used in place of unidentifiable nouns). The sex-related humor is painful, but not sickening. Do movies have to include Colin Sullivan-grade (okay, it wasn’t that bad) obscenities to be good nowadays?

It had its moments, granted. But there was so much sex reference and language that I really couldn’t enjoy it. It could have been so much better, and, in fairness, it could have been a LOT worse. This is not a kid movie, no matter how inviting the cover looks.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 3
James, age 19 (USA)
Negative
Negative—I was really excited about this movie coming out. After having a limited release in theaters I stumbled across some reviews and discussions online. I thought it was a creative and interesting idea and looked forward to seeing how it had been put together. When I rented it, I noticed that it was rated R, but I rented it anyway.

I was extremely disappointed in what I saw. Not only was the movie vulgar, but filled with sexual image after sexual reference after sexual image. Examination of the idea of the dumbing down of our society was limited at best. Mike Judge failed miserably in his attempt to make a comedy out of this topic that, in my opinion, had so much potential. He choose to overlook intelligent humor and filled this movie with perversion and stupidity. The movie lives up to it’s name, although it appears to have been written by the society that it portrays. In brief, it could have been funny, but it wasn’t.
My Ratings: Very Offensive / 2
Natasha, age 29
Negative—This is one of the few films I regret ever seeing. I was a huge fan of Judge’s “Office Space” and was excited to see this movie. Not only was it unfunny but frightening in it’s portrayal of the future. In it Americans have gotten so dumb that garbage has piled up so high that Garbage Avalanches occur, and we have stopped using water to grow plants but Gatorade. It proposes that it is the “dumb” people reproducing leaving the “smart” people to become extinct. Content-wise, there are many F-words and numerous sexual references. Quality-wise it is on the same level as a made for TV comedy. I cannot recommend this film to anyone, not even die hard Mike Judge fans. I can see why Fox refused to show this movie in theatres.
My Ratings: Extremely Offensive / 1
Daniel, age 25

PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.