After the Wedding a.k.a. Efter brylluppetReviewed by: Rev. Grant Wright Offensive
Moviemaking Quality:
½Primary Audience:
Adults
Genre:
Drama
Length:
2 hr.
Year of Release:
2006
USA Release:
March 30, 2007 / DVD release: July 10, 2007
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Relevant Issues
![]() What does the Bible say about adultery? Answer Is there an actual place called “Hell”? Answer How can a God of love send anybody to Hell? Answer Discover the good news that Jesus Christ offers
“Champagne is poured… secrets are spilled.” “After the Wedding” is an alluring story told masterfully by director Susanne Bier and screenwriter Anders Thomas Jensen. The quality of this film caught me a little by surprise, and its success at film festivals and being nominated as best foreign film at the Academy awards are well deserved. Equally as strong as the depth of story are the spectacular performances by Mads Mikkelsen, Rolf Lassgard and Stine Fischer Christensen. Jacob (Mads Mikkelsen) is a miserable, large-hearted man devoted to Indian orphans; he is working for an organization in deep financial trouble. A potential benefactor named Jorgen (Rolf Lassgard) wants to find out more about this non-profit organization and asks for Jacob to return to Denmark to present the needs of the orphanage. It is at this meeting that Jorgen invites Jacob to his daughter Anna’s (Stine Fischer Christensen) wedding. Jacob keen to get the business out of the way and impress Jorgen accepts. It is at the wedding that his life takes a dramatic turn, as his history catches up with his present day reality. The rest of the film uncovers a manipulating scheme for Jacob to take responsibility for a life he didn’t know existed. This is an incredible story with many layers, as each layer peels away the viewer is exposed to more critical information that makes for a heart-wrenching climax. As far as melodramas go, “After the Wedding” succeeds in not turning into a typical soap opera. There are two scenes that are offensive. The first is when Anna throws a deserved tantrum at her mother but manages to use the f-word about 5 times in two sentences. You could stop reading the subtitles for this short scene and avoid the swear words and not miss a critical part of the script. The second offensive scene is a short, adulterous scene where the adulterer is caught, and there is partial nudity for about 4 seconds. One of the most poignant scenes for me as a Christian was of a man who knows he is facing imminent death. This man is terrified and grieved to a point of almost madness. This scene is a catalyst for end of the film, yet I could not help but feel that if this man knew Jesus as his savior his coming death would not have caused the angst he displayed. It is a scene like this that helps me see the urgency that people have for the gospel of Jesus Christ. If I don’t share the good news now, it might be that person’s last chance to hear. Death without Christ would be a scary, scary thing. Violence: None / Profanity: Moderate / Sex/Nudity: Moderate See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers. ![]() Positive - I like foreign subtitled films as I believe you can really focus more on the dialogue reading it and it keeps your concentration. I agree [about] the offensive parts and feel that the 'f' word was unnecessary especially since this seems to be a loving family, but I think at the point the daughter uses this word she is just so frustrated that she loses herself—not really acceptable but yet in the secular non-believing world this happens. The other partial nudity scene could have been conveyed with their clothes on, although no private body parts were really seen, just the woman’s back and the male’s chest. But it was suggestive. |