Reno 911!: Miami

MPAA Rating:

for sexual content, nudity, crude humor, language and drug use

Moral Rating:

_____

E-mail this page to a friend

Moviemaking Quality:

Primary Audience:

Adults

Genre:

Comedy, Adaptation

Length:

1 hr. 24 min.

Year of Release:

2007

USA Release:

February 23, 2007 (wide—2,702 theaters)

Copyright, 20th Century Fox Distribution, Paramount Pictures

Relevant Issues

What are the consequences of sexual immorality? Answer

Fornication

What’s wrong with being gay? Answer
Homosexual behavior versus the Bible: Are people born gay? Does homosexuality harm anyone? Is it anyone’s business? Are homosexual and heterosexual relationships equally valid?

What about gays needs to change? Answer
It may not be what you think.

What should be the attitude of the church toward homosexuals and homosexuality? Answer

Read stories about those who have struggled with homosexuality

Learn how to make your love the best it can be. Christian answers to questions about sex, marriage, sexual addictions, and more. Valuable resources for Christian couples, singles and pastors.

Featuring:	Robert Ben Garant, Thomas Lennon, Niecy Nash, Mary Birdsong, Cedric Yarbrough
Director:	Robert Ben Garant
Producer:	Robert Ben Garant, Kerri Kenney-Silver, Thomas Lennon
Distributor:	20th Century Fox Distribution, Paramount Pictures

Producer’s Synopsis: “The story centers on a rag-tag team of Reno cops that are called in to save the day after a terrorist attack disrupts a national police convention in Miami Beach during spring break. They’re not the best, but that’s all we got. Based on the Comedy Central cable TV series.”

Volunteer reviewer needed for this movie—Request this assignment

See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.

Negative—This would honestly be the worst movie I have ever seen. The overall quality of the acting, humor and general story line was something you would expect a drug addict who is currently heavily under the influence of weed. This is the first movie I have ever walked out of, because I was disgusted by the graphic crudeness of the humor. There was a scene involving an intimate sexual relationship between a man and a woman that was quite repulsive (that is where I walked out). The actual story line was sadly lacking any decent content and is definitely not worth seeing. …lacked any form of laughable humor, and was poorly thought-out and not well conveyed. As a general rule, I have enjoyed most movies I have seen and probably do not have standards as high as some people do. But this is a definite no-go for me.
My Ratings: Extremely Offensive / 1
—Daniel Searle, age 19 (New Zealand0

Movie Critics

…this is not high art. It might not qualify as low art…
—Michael Esposito, Chicago Tribune

…The most difficult thing to overcome is paying full price for a movie that looks so cheap.…
—Peter Hartlaub, San Francisco Chronicle

…it feels overlong and much of the humour is padded…
—Peter Howell, Toronto Star

…the material is almost as hit-or-miss as our heroes' shooting skills…
—Elizabeth Weitzman, New York Daily News

…Overlong and unimaginative… the setups become laborious and the payoffs are minimal…
—Jason Ferguson, Orlando Weekly

…the movie is lessened by that pesky requirement of feature films: a plot that hangs together throughout. (Requirement of good feature films, I should say.)…
—Bill Goodykoontz, The Arizona Republic