Today’s Prayer Focus
MOVIE REVIEW

Roller Ball

MPA Rating: PG-13-Rating (MPA) for violence, extreme sports action, sensuality, language and some drug references.

Reviewed by: Douglas Downs
CONTRIBUTOR

Moral Rating: Very Offensive
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience: Teens Adults
Genre: Action / Sci-Fi
Length: 1 hr. 39 min.
Year of Release: 2002
USA Release:
Scene from “Roller Ball” Chris Klein in “Roller Ball”
Featuring Chris Klein, LL Cool J, Rebecca Romijn, Jean Reno, Naveen Andrews
Director John McTiernan
Producer John McTiernan, Beau St Clair, Charles Roven
Distributor
Distributor: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM). Trademark logo.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
(MGM), owned by Amazon® through MGM Holdings, Inc.

The year was 1975 and a science-fiction film directed by Norman Jewison presented a futuristic world totally controlled by business corporations. There were no wars and the public got it’s violence fix from a sport called “roller ball.” Roller ball is a violent combination of basketball, ice hockey, and roller skating. In the original film, the lead character (played by James Caan) refused to retire and created a great deal of conflict for a corporate industrialist played by John Houseman. The film was rated “R” solely because of the violence.

2002’s remake, directed by John Mctierman (“Die Hard”, “The Hunt for Red October”) as a sports film or a reasonable commentary on violence is incomprehensible. Here is one of the noisiest and most violent PG-13 films made to date. I was at first stunned by most of the violence in “The Lord of the Rings”, but it’s nothing compared to the non-stop brutality of this flik.

We still have a simple sport with a motorcross twist. But this time team members only have to place the metal ball against a metal dish. The team costumes are as outrageous as the New Orleans Mardi Grass. While the original was a commentary on the way a violent game can be used to dampen the antisocial feelings of the masses during the 21st century, this remake seems to be more about the deadly influence TV ratings can have on sports (especially now that the 21st Century is here).

But let’s also not forget about the unspoken power of g-r-e-e-d. The sport is played in Kazakhstan and Mongolia (Central Asia), but broadcast worldwide to an audience that gambles on the outcome of every game.

The film opens with the best part of this very depressing ride. Jonathan Cross (Chris Klein) is seen riding through the streets of San Francisco on the back of his street luge—an admittedly very thrilling opening. His best friend Marcus Ridley (LL Cool J) invites him to skip his hockey tryouts and get in on the lucrative Roller Ball action (you know—show me the money!). Jonathan joins a team called the Horseman and quickly becomes a star. He also becomes romantically involved with the merciless teammate named Aurora (Rebecca Romijn). But soon the two of them uncover deadly plans hatched by Roller Ball creator (Jean Reno) who hopes to hit the financial jackpot by manipulating the ratings with increased doses of violence. (Would-be-viewers need to know that this film was originally rated “R” and won an appeal with the MPA.) There was very little editing involved in retooling the ratings to “PG-13”, but much of the violence was redefined as “extreme sports action.”

Our youth today may be dulled from video games and “WWF Smackdown,” but to market this film to teens is extremely irresponsible. The high level of violence almost makes the original look like “PG” fare by comparison. Parents should also know that there is a strong theme of premarital sex (partial nudity included) that takes place in a co-ed lockerroom. The language in the film also pushes the boundaries: 3 uses of the F-word, obscene gestures, and lots of profanity.

Yes, this film could be a look into our future—but it doesn’t take this much imagination to figure that one out. Shame on MGM for this disgusting release with an obscene amount of negatives. My strong recommendation is to skip this one, enjoy the Olympics for now and maybe a little one-on-one with the kids later.


Viewer CommentsSend your comments
Negative—It wasn’t so much that I found this movie to be bad morally, well it’s not very moral because of what they do, but it was the film itself. I watched the whole movie, and I still don’t know what it’s about. And the editing was horrible, there were a lot of rough jumps, and the continuity was bad, LL Cool J actually disappeared in a scene. This movie is good for one thing, and one thing only, HECKLING!
My Ratings: [Average / 1]
Matt, age 19
Positive—Well, I thought that the movie overall was a good one. Although the club scene and the cursing was “out there” and should have been toned down (way down)…
My Ratings: [Better than Average / 5]
Mary A., age 40
Positive—This Movie Rocked! The action scenes are great, and the story line isn’t boring. The female player comes close to nudity but nothing is shone. Probably okay, But to parents I would suggest seeing it first before letting your kids see it.
My Ratings: [Better than Average / 5]
Powerbytes, age 20
Comments from young people
Positive—I LOVED this movie! The action was great, the special effects were awesome and it was a great movie. “Rollerball” is one of the most action packed movies out there. Theres one scene of innuendo, but there is some quite strong language for PG-13, with every swear word said in it. But the one scene I was most surprised at was a gym scene. A woman walks around topless, with her back to the camera, and when her back isn’t to the camera, only shadows cover her chest.(Nothing is shown though.) But I was surprised at the PG-13 rating. Otherwise this movie is a GREAT action movie!
My Ratings: [Very Offensive / 4½]
Davie, age 14
Negative—Rollerball would have been great except for the naked women, killing, drinking, serious violence, evil plots, sex (didn’t see it, but heard it as I was walking out the door) and whatever else I missed after leaving after the first 20 minutes. My father and I went to see it with high hopes, but left early on because what was happening. There were women exposing their entire backside, and just wearing shadows on their front. You could make their bodies out, but apparently someone thought it should be rated PG-13. This clearly should have been R and offended me highly. And most of the time I let some of that slide. I discourage anyone [from] seeing this…
My Ratings: [Very Offensive / 3½]
Blake Wolf, age 14
Movie Critics
…filled with violent images… locker rooms are co-ed, with glimpses of near-naked women and men dressing, or undressing, between games, although explicit nudity or action is largely avoided…
Preview Family Movie and TV Review