Reviewed by: Hillari Hunter
CONTRIBUTOR
Moral Rating: | Very Offensive |
Moviemaking Quality: |
|
Primary Audience: | Adults |
Genre: | Supernatural Horor Suspense |
Length: | 3 hr. |
Year of Release: | 1999 |
USA Release: |
Featuring | Tom Hanks, James Cromwell, Michael Clarke Duncan, Bonnie Hunt |
Director |
Frank Darabont |
Producer |
David Valdes |
Distributor | Castle Rock Entertainment |
It is no accident that condemned prisoner John Coffey’s (Michael Clarke Duncan) initials are the same as our Savior. Coffey is a gentle giant who is able to heal by placing his hands on the afflicted. After prison guard Paul Edgecombe (Tom Hanks) is cured of an infection, he slowly comes to believe that Coffey is innocent. However, it is 1935, they are in the deep south of the United States, and Coffey, an African-American, has not, and will not get, a fair trial. Despite the obstacles, the men develop a friendship that transcends Death Row.
The supernatural elements of the story enhance their relationship, but does not overpower the plot. It actually enhances the themes of resilience, repentance and faith.
The lead actors are great. Hanks plays Edgecombe as a decent, humane man, who does not relish being an executioner of men, but has a duty to his job. Duncan does well in his part of a child-like man, bewildered by his dire circumstances. Doug Hutchinson (better known as the monster Toombs from a couple of famous “X-Files” episodes) is good as a sadistic guard. Bonnie Hunt, known for comedic roles, is solid as Edgecombe’s supportive wife. Many of the actors shine in smaller roles as well.
There are a couple of scenes of implied sex between Edgecombe and his wife. Several characters use foul language and racial slurs. The violence level is above average. Electric chair executions are shown; one in particular is very graphic. The movie is put together well, and the story is powerful story. This film is strictly for adults.
ONE—yes as so many comments have already said, this film does vividly contrast good and evil, shows miracle healing power (within a twisted medium mind you) and talks interestingly about accountability to God on judgment day.
TWO—hordes of flies coming out of a man’s mouth after healing people; a Christlike figure punishing sinners with mental illness, death and penance; creepy evil characters; and scenes of two mutilated young girls… this is certainly Stephen King NOT Stephen Spielberg… DISTURBING MATERIAL WHILE GOD AND CHRIST ARE PORTRAYED AS VENGEFUL WITH BIZARRE TWISTS TO THEM… I’d be truly afraid of the god portrayed in this movie.
THREE—sickening lengthy execution scenes in particular one botched electric chair attempt in which the victim takes a long long time to die, literally burning in agony. I’m not trying to be preachy, but it seems whereas Christians will not yet tolerate nudity and graphic sex, we’re quite comfortable with gut-wrenching gratuitous violence. Some may say Stephen King is close to salvation. In my view, “The Green Mile” does a lot more to twist Christianity than to reveal it. And even if it was pro-Christian, a dark medium of graphic twisted violence to present it wouldn’t justify this movie anyway. If you really want to watch a full length feature about death row, try “Dead Man Walking” which actually IS redemptive. Or with less disturbing material; “Amistad”, “The Shawshank Redemption,” “Les Miserables” are examples of much better pieces of work. I thought “The Sixth Sense,” a bonified creepy thriller, was much more tolerable to watch than “The Green Mile.” In Canada, “The Green Mile” movie isn’t even R-rated. Bogus indeed. My Ratings: [1/2½]