for strong horror violence and gore, and language.
Reviewed by: Joseph Martinez
CONTRIBUTOR
| Moral Rating: | Offensive |
| Moviemaking Quality: |
|
| Primary Audience: | Adults |
| Genre: | Sci-Fi Horror Comedy |
| Length: | 1 hr. 30 min. |
| Year of Release: | 2006 |
| USA Release: |
March 31, 2006 (wide) |
| Featuring |
|---|
|
Nathan Fillion Elizabeth Banks Michael Rooker Gregg Henry Tania Saulnier William MacDonald |
| Director |
|
James Gunn |
| Producer |
|
Eric Newman Gregory Middleton |
| Distributor |
This film is set in a small American town that becomes infested with alien organisms which enter humans and take over their bodies. The heroes try to fight the aliens and save the planet from being overtaken.
From what I now understand, “Slither” is supposed to be ridiculous. Going in, I had no idea that was the premise. I viewed this film actually thinking it was supposed to be a “quirky” horror film—not a stupid one. Perhaps I should have known better since James Gunn, whose previous writing credits include the “horrific” “Scooby Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed”, wrote and directed this film. “Slither” is one of those films where you laugh at it—and not with it.
The film is supposed to be a tribute to classic B-films, but, in my opinion, it fails miserably. What made B-films work was that audiences back then were less sophisticated. In this digital era we expect more, like realistic effects—as well as a great story. A greater tribute would have been raising the bar and not lowering the standard.
Nathan Fillion and Elizabeth Banks are two talented actors who obviously need work. They do their best with a ridiculous story, terrible dialog and bad direction.
Overall, this film is not quirky, funny or interesting. It is stupid and gross. The humor and language are inappropriate for the immature teen audience for which this film seems targeted. In all honesty, I think most people will find it to be a waste of time and money. I do enjoy comedies and can go to a theater and have “fun,” but this film was absolutely atrocious.
Save your time and money, and skip this low-budget and embarrassing film. If you decide to go see it, please do not take children or teenagers, as there are many adult themes in this R-rated film.
Violence: Moderate / Profanity: Heavy / Sex/Nudity: Moderate
See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.


I’m ashamed and was embarrassed to watch it with my wife of nearly 14 years. I hope writing this review will cause some good to come from my foolish submission to such a film. I can handle some gore and profanity, but this movie went to extremes. There was blatant bashing of our Lord and Savior, and there is certainly enough blood and guts to satisfy the appetite of the hardcore horror fan. *SPOILER* Here’s an example of the gore factor: One guy is “whipped” one time so hard by the “squid dude” that he literally splits in half vertically. His insides spill out! How much more grotesque can you get? There are also scenes where people are eating other people. It is very graphic.
There is a total disregard for morals and values. I don’t mean from the movie necessarily. Rather, how can parents let their children participate in such atrocities? Yeah, it’s a movie, but children are allowed to run amuck nonetheless. It was degrading to watch, let alone imagining that these people willfully submitted themselves to obvious evil. This is cheesy plotted, acting challenged, ill special effected, and luster lacking entertainment. It’s a waste of time for anybody—Christian or not.
My Ratings: Very Offensive / 2½