Prayer Focus
Click here to watch THE HOPE on-line!

Shutter Island also known as “Ashecliffe,” “Ilha do Medo,” “La Isla siniestra,” “La isla siniestra,” “Prekliaty ostrov,” “Prokletý ostrov,” “Slegta sala,” “Suletud saar,” “Suljettu saari,” “Kuzdesiu sala,” “To nisi ton Kataramenon,” “Zindan adasi,” “Остров проклятых”

MPAA Rating: R-Rating (MPAA) for disturbing violent content, language and some nudity.

Reviewed by: Ethan Samuel Rodgers

Extremely Offensive
Moviemaking Quality:

Primary Audience:
Suspense Mystery Psychological Thriller Drama
2 hr. 18 min.
Year of Release:
USA Release:
February 19, 2010 (wide—2,500+ theaters)
DVD: June 8, 2010
Copyright, Paramount Pictures click photos to ENLARGE Copyright, Paramount Pictures Copyright, Paramount Pictures Copyright, Paramount Pictures Copyright, Paramount Pictures Copyright, Paramount Pictures Copyright, Paramount Pictures Copyright, Paramount Pictures Copyright, Paramount Pictures Copyright, Paramount Pictures
Relevant Issues
Copyright, Paramount Pictures

FEAR, Anxiety and Worry… What does the Bible say? Answer

About murder in the Bible

Death in the Bible

Final judgment

VIOLENCE—How does viewing violence in movies affect families? Answer

Featuring: Leonardo DiCaprio (Teddy Daniels), Mark Ruffalo (Chuck Aule), Ben Kingsley (Dr. John Cawley), Emily Mortimer (Rachel Solando), Michelle Williams (Dolores Chanal), Max von Sydow (Dr. Jeremiah Naehring), Patricia Clarkson (Ethel Barton), Jackie Earle Haley (George Noyce), See all »
Director: Martin Scorsese
Producer: Paramount Pictures, Phoenix Pictures, Sikelia Productions, Appian Way, Chris Brigham, Chris Brigham, Brad Fischer, Amy Herman, Laeta Kalogridis, Dennis Lehane, Mike Medavoy, Arnold Messer, Gianni Nunnari, Louis Phillips, Joseph P. Reidy, Martin Scorsese, Emma Tillinger
Distributor: Paramount Pictures

“Someone is missing.”

It’s certainly not a horror film, nor is quite a thriller. It’s not a drama, nor is it truly a mystery. “Shutter Island,” the latest film from Academy Award Winning Director Martin Scorsese, is really best described as a long walk, or a 138 minute run time, for a short drink of water, or in Shutter’s case, a simple and less than satisfying ending.

Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a U.S. Marshall who has been appointed to investigate the escape of a patient from a mental hospital for the criminally insane. With the hospital located on a small island and surrounded by miles of cold Atlantic water and rock bluffs, she is presumed to be hiding or dead. But as Daniels digs deeper into the case, he finds more secrets and perhaps more truth about the island and himself than he ever wanted to find.

Considering its pedigree, “Shutter…” was fairly dissatisfying. Coming from a director as talented as Scorsese, one expects a little more. The elements were all there: the camera angles, the stylized dark noir-esque scenes, and, of course, DiCaprio as the lead. But there were many elements that missed the mark. The musical score was overly dramatic, as violins pounded and shrieked relentlessly during calm car rides and walks through the hospital grounds. Dialogue was confusing in places, almost nonsensical and humorous in others, and Mark Ruffalo was, as usual, underwhelming in his supporting role, adding little to the on screen chemistry as DiCaprio’s partner throughout the ordeal.

The film’s biggest downfall is that it was simply too long for the message it had. Muddled in Scorsese’s ramblings and story telling, the whole ordeal felt like stumbling down an all too familiar psychological path en route to a bogged down dénouement. The conclusion which we’re presented as an audience is simply not enough to justify sitting for more than two hours, and exacts a “that’s it?” response from those who have been waiting attentively for a shocker ending that no one will expect. Unfortunately, your gut instinct as to what’s really going on is probably correct from minute 1.

30 to 40 profanities litter the script of “Shutter Island”, and can get quite coarse in some places, including 16 f-words and over 15 misuses of God’s names. Disturbing images are perhaps your biggest deterrent as various scenes of German death camps, dying or dead children, and graphic hallucinations of death and murder are ever present and quite realistic. There’s little sexual aspect to speak of, although there is a scene where Daniels descends into the cellar of part of the hospital and sees men who have been caged, and conceivably tortured, and are also nude.

“Shutter Island” certainly has Scorsese’s fingerprints all over it, but I feel as though he focused too much on the telling of the story, adapted from the novel by Dennis Lehane, rather than the conclusion. The story itself needed one more twist, not another overly dramatic walk down a long dimly lit hallway. It needed one final shock, not another seemingly meaningless dialogue exchange that we’re not meant to “get” until the end. “Shutter…” ultimately needed a moment of inspiration in its final 15 minutes to be more than just another thriller, but instead it was more an absurdly long hallucination or drug-trip accentuated by flashing scene transitions, gruesome and stylized images, and redundant and overly frequent dream sequences.

Ultimately, “Shutter Island” will certainly make you quiver, maybe even wince, but there’s little to shutter about in this mediocre, shockless, twistless disappointment.

Violence: Extreme / Profanity: Heavy to Extreme / Sex/Nudity: Moderate

See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.

Viewer CommentsSend your comments
Comments below:
Positive—…“Shutter Island” is an expertly crafted thriller from Scorsese, who takes the source material by Lehane and completely brings it to life. The reviewer seemed dissatisfied with the conclusion to the film, which makes me wonder exactly what he would’ve liked to see. He references that from “minute 1” you can guess what’s going on, and while you can assume part of what’s going on, that’s done purposefully by Scorsese because that assumption becomes somewhat of a red herring by the movie’s end. In fact, it’s literally impossible to deduct the entire ending of “Shutter Island” based on its first minute, and it’s that complexity that makes the film great.

There’s a lot going on in this film, with subplots ranging from alcoholism to war stories to sick and twisted killings. Scorsese manages to keep all these plates spinning while delivering a suspenseful tale. Every bit of dialogue is for a specific purpose (especially Mark Ruffalo’s, which for some reason didn’t please Mr. Rogers), in fact, thinking about the film after viewing it makes you realize all of the clues you missed along the way.

While you can’t rank “Shutter Island” with Scorsese’s absolute best, it’s a very solid piece of entertainment reminiscent of a more bloody version of a good Hitchcock film.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4
DT, age 26 (USA)
Positive—…love the movie… I like the twist. I was expecting it to be more scary. Myself and my wife and daughter all enjoyed the movie. I will watch it again when it comes out on DVD, and I usually never watch a movie twice.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Tony Andrews, age 46 (Canada)
Positive—I am not a great movie goer nor a talented reviewer. If you are going to see the movie, don’t complain about the profanity—and is it any different than the world you live in? The movie was good. It was an incomplete twist ending, but if you need everything in boxes, then don’t watch it. DiCaprio is a good actor, regardless of the script’s deficiencies. Frankly, I would rather read a good book.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 3½
Dunk, age 49 (Canada)
Positive—After reading Dennis Lehane’s novel, Shutter Island, I went out and saw the film version. The movie was pretty close to the book, leaving out only minor details. The film was good for the most part. Like the commenters and the reviewer have said, it does have a Hitchcock touch to it. This may not be Scorsese’s best film, but it’s still good.

What I didn’t like about the film was the excessive profanity. Also, a character in the film states that “God loves violence,” when in fact, He frowns upon it.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Very Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4
Shannon H., age 28 (USA)
Positive—Going into “Shutter Island,” my expectations were remarkably high. I am a huge fan of Dicaprio, and Scorsese, alike. The movie delivers in a magical fashion. Brilliant the entire way through. The movie is very disturbing, mostly during the first half, and for good reason. There is a very reasonable explanation for all these occurrences at the end of the film. …
My Ratings: Moral rating: Good / Moviemaking quality: 5
Andrew McCutchen, age 22 (USA)
Positive—In making a “moral” judgment on a film like “Shutter Island” is to miss the point of the movie. The movie delves into the human mind and how your mind can deceive you into thinking that you are OK and the “other guy” is not—the way most people throughout history have thought. Mental illness is what this film is all about.

It also shows how mental patients used to be treated in this country and, in some countries, are still being treated, today. Nothing in this film shocked me. Shock treatments and lobotomies were common occurrences in the 1930s and 40s. The story of movie star Francis Farmer comes to mind whenever I think of stories about lobotomies. The standard version of the Frances Farmer story goes somewhat like this: An idealistic young actress challenges the hypocrisy of her world and becomes the victim of a spiteful mother, a vengeful Hollywood, and a cabal of callous and arrogant psychiatrists.

Together they force her into a state mental hospital, where she is brutalized by electric shock and other barbaric treatments; raped by orderlies, fellow inmates, and soldiers from a nearby Army base; and eventually lobotomized.

Her rebellious spirit finally shattered, she leaves the institution barely a half-woman and, only a shadow of the vibrant artist she had once been.

In “Shutter Island,” DiCaprio’s character, Teddy Daniels, is lost in a world of self delusion, thinking he is the “hero” going after his wife’s killer and through a series of hallucinations and dreams, he discovers—with the aid of the head psychiatrist—that He (Teddy) is the real killer of his wife who killed their three children. Shutter Island, is dealing with spiritual forces that psychiatry thinks are and is treated as mental illness. Not all mental illness is demonic but, a lot of it is. Many times it can be treated with psychotropic medications. But, in Teddy’s case, the horror of losing all three of his children overwhelms his sense of right and wrong and kills his wife for destroying his life. Then, he invents an alternate killer, and he is the special agent assigned to find him.

I find nothing in this movie to be “anti-Christian”. It is about life on planet Earth and the state that “man” finds himself in, but, can’t even begin to understand. True, we are dealing with extreme events in this movie; but, not that extreme. If you want to experience extreme events, read the daily newspaper, and see all the human tragedy and carnage that’s happening every single day.

I don’t know what Christians think movies are supposed to be like. Are they all supposed to be Bambies and daffodils where the “good guys” always win and the “hero” wears a white hat and ends up with the “girl”? We don’t live in the “Land of Oz” (if you saw the movie you would know what I mean).

We live in a world where everything dies and there is seldom a happy ending. And, the sooner we come to that realization the sooner and closer we will come to God—the real God, the Creator of the Universe!!!
My Ratings: Moral rating: Good / Moviemaking quality: 4
thinknblink, age 67 (USA)
Positive—I watched this movie with Clearplay, which filters movies, so I had to guess on the moral quality. With it filtered, it was not offensive, but I know the filter cut out more than a few cuss words. That said, I thought this was one of the best movies I have seen in awhile. I found this movie to keep my attention throughout, with no slow periods. I even watched it twice.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 5
Pam, age 43 (USA)
Positive—I really enjoyed this film. Yes, it has language and male frontal nudity in it. However, the nudity is not sexual in any way, and is brief. I found the movie to be sad, but yet eye-opening. The mentally ill patients are looked down upon by some, but one of the doctors chooses to see them as human beings, and I thought that was good. It’s sad to think that this is how mentally ill patients were treated (and like one other person said, may still be treated that way today), but thankfully things have come a long way, and more options are available to those who need it. Lots of twists in the plot, and I liked that.

Obviously there are some disturbing scenes including dead bodies, and when Teddy sees his wife, she is often seen bleeding or her body is being burning. I think all of the actors did a great job in this film. However, if you are easily offended, please do not see this film.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Sarah, age 26 (USA)
Positive—“Shutter Island” is a film about mental insanity, which is a very real thing. Those who are interested in studying the subject will find the film intriguing. Those looking for a good psychological thriller will enjoy it, too. It’s a thought-provoking movie for anyone. It’s not for those with weak nerves, but, for those who have strong nerves, the ending leaves you thinking on serious matters. It brings to life the things that some people have to go through.

And it does not glamorize evil, at all. The sin that sometimes results from insanity is portrayed as a very tragic thing. As a general rule, the movie is not exploitative. The only significant thing that is outright offensive is the language. There’s barely any sexual content, it’s the violence that makes this film only for the mature. But, quite frankly, I’m indignant that Christians would say a film is “extremely offensive” when all it does is portray insanity in a thought-provoking, accurately gritty, and usually tasteful way.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Gabriel Mohler, age 25 (USA)
Neutral—I’ve only seen this movie once and call me a simpleton but I didn’t get it. It’s a bit difficult to comment on the whole movie without giving too much away but honestly what was the point of it? To fool the audience? Was it entertaining? There’s no doubt the movie was intriguing and suspenseful, the acting was excellent and the cinematography atmospheric and engrossing. However, the confusing tangled web of hallucinations, dreams and what was really going on with the main character was in the end a hard pill to swallow.

I left the movie feeling duped and thinking what a waste of time and effort for a movie, (although it was based on a novel). If you like suspenseful movies this one has promise but here’s its problem: the unexpected twist at the end insults the viewers comprehension of everything that comes before. It did at least with mine! It’s definitely one of those movies you have to watch a second time to glean it from a different perspective but is it worth it? In fairness to the novel it’s based on, the script and director Scorsese’s movie making it does make you think and that’s a good thing. It messes with your head, but I’m not so keen to watch it a second time to figure it out!

I give it a neutral review due to my lack of understanding it. If you want to see movie’s that are similar but not so obscure watch “The Sixth Sense” (1999) or “Hide and Seek” (2005).
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Martin C, age 40 (Australia)
Negative—Storyline—very, very entertaining. Acting—excellent. Use of the Lord’s name—abysmal. Very disturbing images throughout the movie. I should have read the review here before going to see the movie. Sometimes the foul language passed so quickly or under someone’s breath, it was one of those “did he just say what I thought he said” moments. Most of it seems to be in the first half of the movie. There is also a 30 second or so scene of full male nudity and some graphic violence as he remembers his WWII experience. If the misuse of the Lord’s name is offensive to you, and you want to see it, wait for the DVD to come out and watch it with TV Guardian on. I wish I would have.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 5
G Johnston, age 48 (USA)
Negative—I have never written a comment about a movie before, but after watching Shutter Island, I felt compelled to do just that. I was very surprised at all of the positive comments about this movie. It was extremely dark and disturbing. It crawled along at a snail’s pace. After it was finally over, I wished I had never rented it. It reminded me of why I need to carefully read the reviews before I rent movies.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 2
Brad, age 49 (USA)
Comments from young people
Positive—I just watched this movie with my friends and their parents. After seeing the intense commercial for it I wanted to see it badly thinking it would creep me out. That it did. This movie, although disturbing and dar (it’s R rated right??) I found to be quite enjoyable. The violence was “tasteful” and used to progress the story line. Language was not over the top and often they used minor words when they could have used much stronger words. In other words this movie was done well, with not enough violence or cussing to turn me off to it but just enough to make it real and very creepy. P.S. I’m going to be staying for for a month trying to wrap my head around the twists at the end.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 3½
Eli Morrow, age 17 (USA)
Positive—Very good! Lots of f-words, but, overall, it wasn’t a bad movie. There are major twists and turns in it. It wasn’t very offensive in terms of violence or “disturbing content.” I’m 13 and I rented it on DVD. I just have to say that it kept me on the edge of my seat the entire time. I could sum it up in three words, “creepy, psychological mystery.”

Bottomline: Very entertaining, creepy, and interesting. If you can handle the language (I could) then I recomend it to teens and adults. No one younger than that. Watch it.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Noah, age 13 (Canada)
Neutral—I just saw “Shutter Island,” and I must say I was shocked. From the preview, this movie looked fairly entertaining and interesting. It was completely different from my expectations in every aspect. It was brilliantly made, with intriguing plot twists and excellent acting, especially from Leonardo DiCaprio as the lead role.

Unfortunately, its moral aspects astounded me in a negative way. From the previews, I expected some blood and language, considering its R rating. There was lots of both in the movie, from more than ten f-words to a Nazi leader shown laying on the floor with a huge hole in his face, blood flowing, as his troops are murdered by DiCaprio and his friends outside. From a Christian standpoint, I can find very little positivity from this film, since there was almost no Christain basis for morality; nor any Christian elements at all, save a decent quote from DiCaprio, “I thought God gave us a moral order.” At this, he is contradicting another man, who claims, “God loves violence. He gave it to us so we could use it as an offering to Him.”

From a moviewatcher’s standpoint, I was thoroughly impressed by the way the film was made. I was shocked and depressed by the ending, however, which leaves the viewer with a sad and regrettful feeling, as though nothing has been accomplished since the beginning of the movie.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Addison E., age 14 (USA)