Reviewed by: Gabriel Mohler
What part should morality play in politics? Answer
Does HIGH MORAL CHARACTER matter in political leaders? Answer
spin doctors / truth and lies in political campaigns
American political campaign strategies
how marketing strategies are use to manipulate the opinions of voters
evaluate the claim that “there’s only one wrong in political campaigns and that’s losing”
evaluate the comment, “if you fight monsters too long, you become one”
VOTING—Do Christians have an obligation to vote? Answer
Should Christians seek political power or should we only focus on evangelism? Answer
|Featuring:||Sandra Bullock … “Calamity” Jane Bodine
Billy Bob Thornton … Pat Candy
Joaquim de Almeida … Pedro Gallo
See all »
|Director:||David Gordon Green|
See all »
|Distributor:||Warner Bros. Pictures|
When you’re in the movie reviewing ministry, a variety of messages and agendas come and go. And sometimes—in fact, I daresay often—you know about a half hour into a film that you’re going to have to censure it. And I’m not talking about content issues, like language or nudity, I’m talking about the message the movie preaches at the audience. Not all movies preach, for example, action movies are usually more about the entertainment of watching good triumph over evil. But when you’re reviewing a political drama, you have to be careful to pay close attention. But every once in a while, you come across a movie that seems to be driving an evil message all the way through, and then suddenly the ending takes a moral turn and shows that the protagonists were wrong. “Our Brand is Crisis” was one of these pleasant surprises.
Loosely based on true events, “Our Brand Is Crisis,” follows Jane Bodine (Sandra Bullock) and her campaign team when they are hired to help Pedro Castillo win a presidential election in Bolivia. Their main tactic is to emphasize the many problems of the economy and present Castillo as the solution. This is the meaning of the title. I found the film to be very interesting, and all the cast put on some of their best performances I’ve seen.
Honestly, I didn’t know what to expect, on a number of levels. The last movie I reviewed was “Burnt,” which was called a comedy by many, but I found it not to be a comedy at all—just a drama with occasional humor. This film isn’t as dark as “Burnt,” and has more amusing moments, including some comic relief, but still shouldn’t be classified as a comedy. But the main mystery to me was the message of this film. Some reviews said it was ambiguous. Some said it was staunchly communist. Some said it was insightful. So I knew that, in this case, I would just have to find out for myself.
Before I address the message, I’ll review the content. The R-rating is because of the language. This is yet another film that could have been PG (maybe PG-13 due to a mooning scene) with a cleaner script. There are 12 misuses of “god,” Jesus (1), Jesus Christ (1), hell (3) and d*mn (3). In addition, there are 20+ f-words, s-words (19), and one each of a**, SOB, p*ssed, p*ssy, b*stard, b***h, tw*t, cr*p, and t*rd. There are also two middle finger displays.
There is very little violence. Someone smashes an egg on Castillo, who spectacularly punches the “assailant.” After this incident, however, Castillo “shows the other side of him” by being kind to protesters who throw rocks at his bus. A llama is shown getting hit by a car.
There are very occasional crude sexual references. A bra is used as a slingshot, and two shirtless men are briefly shown. Mimicking the behavior in the actress’s previous film, “Minions,” Jane is shown mooning a bus. By the way, the bus driver is paid to drive like a complete moron to do it. Played for laughs? Um, yes. Still offensive? Um, yes. It’s very obvious when she’s going to do it, so it would be easy for viewers to close their eyes until all the yelling and laughter dies down.
Since I’m reviewing this film for its DVD release, I’ve already taken into consideration the opinions of other reviewers. Nevertheless, there’s not much reason for you to take my word over theirs. The message I got from this movie was very positive. When people say it’s a communist movie, I think they are hugely misunderstanding the movie’s point. Throughout almost all of the film, Jane and her team use dirty manipulation to campaign for Castillo. Jane says “There is only one wrong in this, and that is losing.” But at the end, the team realizes how wrong they were—in a shocking way. I can barely imagine the humiliation! When Jane realizes how much she hurt the country, she’s so upset that she actually quits her business and joins the protesters. So yes, throughout the film, the protagonists—the ones portrayed as “good guys”—use communistic propaganda. But at the end, their methods are “exposed” to the viewers as evil. It’s pretty powerful, actually. For those who want more detail, I have written a paragraph below containing spoilers.
***SPOILER*** Castillo wins the election, and immediately breaks all his promises and turns out to be a tyrant. Jane and her team had no idea he would do that. At first Jane is defensive, claiming that she was just doing her job, but soon her heart is softened as she realizes the mess she helped to make. She realizes that she was deceived by Castillo, just like she was attempting to deceive the people of Bolivia. The deception disgusts her. ***END SPOILER***
This is a competent film that shows how foxy political campaigns can be. I have to rate it Offensive, due to its foul language, several blasphemies, and Sandra Bullock’s bare hiny. But if you can be wary of those things, I do recommend this film. It’s educational and leaves you with serious thoughts about political power.
Violence: Moderate / Profanity: Heavy / Sex/Nudity: Moderate to heavys
See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.