Christmas with the Kranks
for brief language and suggestive content.
Reviewed by: Ed Cox
CONTRIBUTOR
| Moral Rating: | Better than Average |
| Moviemaking Quality: |
|
| Primary Audience: | Adults |
| Genre: | Comedy |
| Length: | 1 hr. 50 min. |
| Year of Release: | 2004 |
| USA Release: |
November 24, 2004 |
REVIEWS of other Christmas movies
| Featuring |
Tim Allen Jamie Lee Curtis Dan Aykroyd Julie Gonzalo Jake Busey |
| Director |
Joe Roth |
| Producer |
Michael Barnathan Chris Columbus Mark Radcliffe |
| Distributor |
“No! Ho! Ho!”
Here’s what the distributor says about their film: “Imagine a year without Christmas. No crowded malls, no corny office parties, no fruitcakes, no unwanted presents. That’s just what Luther (Allen) and Nora Krank (Curtis) have in mind when they decide that, just this once, they’ll skip the holiday altogether, despite the fact that they’re usually the most fanatical about it. They might as well, since it won’t be the same without their daughter, who’s away in the tropics. They get the idea to JOIN their daughter in sunny paradise as a surprise, and thus, theirs will be the only house on Hemlock Street without a rooftop Frosty; they won’t be hosting their annual Christmas Eve bash; they aren’t even going to have a tree. But when their daughter surprises THEM by cutting her trip short and returning home for Christmas, there’s a mad scramble to prepare themselves to have the traditional Christmas fanfare on extremely short notice.”
When the producer’s of the movie can’t get the description of the plot exactly right, it gives you an idea the movie is going to have its fits and starts and perhaps never confidently reach the finish line. The daughter is with the Peace Corps in Peru, which may be a tropical climate, but not exactly an island paradise.
Before anyone reads too far and misses this point—here is the main one to offer in the review. THIS IS NOT A CHILDREN’S MOVIE. It is an adult-themed movie that does not cross the PG line, but does use humor in a way that goes way over the head of the children in attendance. If you are expecting to see another in the “Santa Clause” franchise you are going to be disappointed.
Things to watch out for—1 D, 1 H, a few Lord’s name in vain. There are a several jokes regarding “but it’s not even Saturday night” that made me feel uncomfortable sitting with my 12-year-old daughters. Yes, the two main characters are married, but the “will the table hold” was over the top. Add in a yard of cleavage from both a bit-character as well as Ms. Curtis at a tanning booth (as well as Tim Allen in a Speedo), and the visuals in this movie are a little much.
Anytime Hollywood makes a “Christmas” movie, you have a conflict of interest between the world view and a Christ-centered view. Your eschatology will not be challenged with this movie as all references to Christmas are white icing feel good with no messy references to Christ that make Hollywood want to wear oven mitts.
See our special section on the true meaning of Christmas
The standard fare is man thinks of self, world reacts in horror, man reflects, man changes self. As we know from Scripture, none are worthy, no not one. We do not have the ability to change except that which is granted by God through the Holy Spirit to change the heart and therefore the life.
The only two references to “church” in the film is an argument between husband and wife about whether they will make a donation to the church as they always do. The argument was not about whether they are honoring the teachings of scripture about money management and tithing (the most talked about subject in the Bible), but rather treat this issue in the same breath as buying the annual Police calendar. The second is a mall scene with Jamie Lee Curtis in a bikini designed for a younger woman, only to be discovered by her priest.
I wanted so desperately for this movie to work. The joy of having Tim Allen and Jamie Lee Curtis in a movie together under a family theme seemed to hold such promise. But I’m afraid I must report that the movie just does not work. It comes across as white cake that is sprinkled with a few funny gags that could easily be placed anywhere on the cake for effect. It is indeed as if the left hand of the movie didn’t know what the right hand was doing.
Our audience at the 11:10AM showing had a number of young children in attendance, so my comments about this being adult humor is field tested—they just sat there and ate their popcorn. I do need to clarify that this is not adult in the common use of four letter words as supposedly “adult” language. Rather, the humor is steeped in situations that only adults will appreciate (the husband trying desperately to please his wife in the placement of outdoor lights to no avail, only to be electrically shocked and fall into the shrubs for his effort). You have to have lived that type of moment to really appreciate it. Having an adult child bring home a boyfriend who has asked for her hand in marriage is another example. An empty nester moment, one lost on tweeners and below.
The movie sits in at about 1 hour and 50 minutes and leaves a bland taste in the mouth. Leave the young kids at home, the money will only be wasted. Rent “Elf” for them which has more of a kid flavor. As for your teenagers and adults, this movie is not going to clear the fence; it will be on store shelves next Christmas in the $5.99 bargain bin.
See our personal interview with Tim Allen, Dan Aykroyd and one of the producers of “Christmas with the Kranks.”Where does the impetus come from for people to make the kind of sacrifices that Tim Allen’s character makes in this movie? GO
If you do end up seeing the movie, here are some things to watch for and talk with your children about (for there are positives nestled in the branches of the script).
Tim Allen does make a magnanimous gesture in the film—talk about what would motivate someone to do that. This movie actually shows a normal, functional family—something unusual for Hollywood to be sure.
There are neighbors helping neighbors even within the comedic folds of the story—talk about our charge to help our neighbor.
Finally and most importantly, there is a character in the story (Marty) that no one knows. Ask your child (or yourself) how someone can walk through life, seeing everything and not be noticed.
Violence: Minor / Profanity: Minor / Sex/Nudity: Minor
[2]
[Good/4]
[Better than Average/3½]
My grandson (age 11) and I really wanted to see the movie because parts of it (the neighborhood where the Kranks live) were filmed here in Downey (on the old Rockwell property) and we saw some of the night time filming and confess we were really curious. It was well worth the time and money to see the movie—and I think everyone in the theatre seemed to enjoy it.
[Better than Average/4]
There are moral references to church, tithing over worldly desires and a priest that sees the Kranks in an unlikely area of a tanning salon at a Mall. There is more emphasis on the worldly approach to Christmas than CHrist-like. But strong inferences to family and friends pulling together when tough times takes place.
There is even a bit of forgiveness to a mild “bah-humbug” attitude of Mr. Krank (Tim Allen). There are some curse words that could be left out and one has to wonder what value these expletive remarks provide in any theatrical event. My wife and I did get some chuckles over several events in the movie and felt that the moral overtone was much better than today’s average movie. I believe that he movie is more suited for adults and older children (teenage and up).
[Better than Average/3½]
[Good/4½]
[Better than Average/4]
[Good/4]
We took our 12 and 10 year old kids, and left with zero family issues to discuss. For parents, there is one scene where the wife (Jamie Lee Curtis) thinks she and the husband (Tim Allen) are about to “fool around.” They don’t, of course, but it was well played for laughs. Hey, the characters are married, so it’s no big deal… when’s the last time a movie used sex WITHIN a marriage for a laugh?
There is zero discussion of the real meaning of Christmas. This is a totally secular film, but you could do worse.
[Good/3]
[Average/4]
“Christmas With the Kranks” is, in total honesty, just about the worst movie I have ever seen. It is not funny. It is not touching. It is not inspiring. It IS a waste of two hours of your life, though, and a misplacement of money. What if everyone who saw this piece of junk had seen “The Polar Express” instead? How much better the world would be! THAT is a funny and creative and warm and certainly family-friendly Holiday movie. Go see it!
A few things: Why was it impossible to tell the daughter their new Christmas plans? Is she 6 years old? Are her emotions so fragile that to tell her the truth would send her into fits of depression? Why couldn’t she and her boyfriend come home and all of them decorate together? Was anyone else unsettled by the Nazi-mentality of the neighborhood? And then, of course, the movie has us take their side at the end, because really, the Nazis were misunderstood. All of the “gags” in the movie are totally implausible. And yes, I know it’s a comedy, I’m fine with that. I’m not looking for REALITY, so much as some sense of logic.
For instance, why would the Jamie Lee Curtis character just stand there in the tanning salon, while her priest and everyone else stares? We know she’s self-conscious, se NEVER would have walked out there like that, and she never would have stayed out there to “chat” with the priest. This is but one example of how the comedy was forced, and therefor grew increasingly unfunny as the movie plodded along, toward a climax of total pointlessness. I don’t understand how anyone could actually LIKE this movie, I really don’t! I like Tim Allen! I like Jamie Lee Curtis! How is it that “Freaky Friday” seems more realistic than this movie?
[Good/1]
[Good/1]
[Better than Average/4]
[Good/5]
[Good/4½]
[Good/2½]
[Better than Average/4]
[Good/4]
[Average/2½]
[Good/4½]
My Ratings: [Better than Average/4]