Reviewed by: Charity Bishop
CONTRIBUTOR
Moral Rating: | Offensive |
Moviemaking Quality: |
|
Primary Audience: | • Preteens • Family • Teens • Young-Adults • Adults |
Genre: | Drama |
Length: | 2 hr. 2 min. |
Year of Release: | 2019 |
USA Release: |
September 20, 2019 (wide—3,050 theaters) DVD: December 17, 2019 |
ROYALTY of the Bible: kings / queens / princes
Families that fall out of friendship due to inheritance issues
Fear of being cheated out of rightful inheritance
Arrogance versus humility
Jealousy
Fear of humiliation
Wife upset at her intolerable husband, but decides to remain faithful
What does the Bible say about marriage? Answer —
What does Scripture say about STEALING? Answer
Insertion of male homosexuality and a Gay nightclub into this film
What about Gays needs to change? Answer —It may not be what you think.
GAY—What’s wrong with being Gay? Answer —Homosexual behavior versus the Bible: Are people born Gay? Does homosexuality harm anyone? Is it anyone’s business? Are homosexual and heterosexual relationships equally valid?
Child born out of wedlock—and a parent’s duty
Featuring |
Hugh Bonneville … Robert Crawley, Earl of Grantham Elizabeth McGovern … Cora Crawley, Countess of Grantham Michelle Dockery … Lady Mary Crawley Laura Carmichael … Lady Edith Crawley / Lady Edith Pelham, the Marchioness of Hexham Harry Hadden-Paton … Herbert “Bertie” Pelham, the 7th Marquess of Hexham Maggie Smith … Violet Crawley, Dowager Countess of Grantham, mother of Robert Penelope Wilton … Isobel Grey, Baroness Merton Imelda Staunton … Lady Maud Bagshaw, Queen Mary's lady-in-waiting and Robert Crawley’s cousin Allen Leech … Tom Branson Jim Carter … Charles Carson Robert James-Collier … Mr. Thomas Barrow, the butler Matthew Goode … Henry Talbot Tuppence Middleton … Lucy Smith, Lady Bagshaw’s maid Phyllis Logan … Mrs. Elsie Hughes Raquel Cassidy … Phyllis Baxter Simon Jones … King George V Geraldine James … Queen Mary Kate Phillips … Princess Mary, Viscountess Lascelless David Haig … Mr. Wilson, the King’s butler Max Brown … Richard Ellis, the King’s Royal Dresser Brendan Coyle … John Bates Joanne Froggatt … Anna Bates Lesley Nicol … Mrs. Beryl Patmore Sophie McShera … Mrs. Daisy Mason See all » |
Director |
Michael Engler |
Producer |
Carnival Film and Television [Great Britain] Focus Features See all » |
Distributor |
Sequel: “Downton Abbey: A New Era” (2022)
“Downton Abbey” is a treat for long-time fans, with the same sparkling wit, dazzling costumes, and scheming above and below stairs that held us captive for six seasons of the internationally successful television series.
The letter from Buckingham Palace causes quite a stir when it arrives. The king and queen wish to visit Downton on one of their country trips. Lord and Lady Grantham (Hugh Bonneville and Elizabeth McGovern) feel honored. Their eldest daughter, Lady Mary (Michelle Dockery), is a little apprehensive, since their former-footman-turned butler Thomas Barrow (Robert James-Collier) has never handled a royal visit. The downstairs staff, ranging from the formidable housekeeper Mrs. Hughes (Phyllis Logan) to the ambitious anti-royalist cook Daisy (Sophie McShera) are in a tizzy about what to fix the monarchy for dinner. And everyone is a tad bit worried what their resident Irish Republican, Tom Branson (Allen Leech), might do, given his strong anti-monarchist sentiments.
Overwhelmed with concerns about everything running in tiptop shape, Lady Mary elicits the help of the family’s retired butler, Mr. Carson (Jim Carter) to manage the household. But he gets more than he bargained for once the royal staff arrives. Upstairs, Lady Edith (Laura Carmichael) lets her husband in on a secret, and a series of missing household treasures suggest a thief has come to the house. Then there’s Daisy’s reluctance to get married, an inconvenient boiler that refuses to give them any hot water, and Lady Violet’s (Maggie Smith) determination to get to the bottom of a family mystery, with the aid of her often-rival, Isabel (Penelope Wilton).
Fans know what they are in for—many characters and subplots, razor-sharp witty exchanges between frienemies Violet and Isobel, Mary’s touching relationship with Mr. Carson… and even a touch of blackmail. The result is a glittering, nostalgic return to everyone’s favorite estate. This is a world where an ill-fitting dress is a disaster. It offers plenty of happy endings and even a few tears. It introduces new love stories and resolves older ones. And it looks gorgeous doing it. Downton Abbey looms on the big screen in a cinematic way, and the lush 20’s costumes, diamond tiaras, and green grounds abound with spectacle.
The offensive content is consistent with the original series. There is little violence (a man and woman wrestle a gun away from a terrorist) and only minor language (a servant uses “bloody” and is reprimanded because “there are ladies present;” once or twice, characters say “Oh, my God!”), but the film dwells on Thomas’ homosexuality toward the end. Men kiss and dance in a Gay club. Thomas finds out a friend is Gay, and they part with a kiss.
GAY—What’s wrong with being Gay? Answer —Homosexual behavior versus the Bible: Are people born Gay? Does homosexuality harm anyone? Is it anyone’s business? Are homosexual and heterosexual relationships equally valid?
What about Gays needs to change? Answer —It may not be what you think.
Read stories about those who have struggled with homosexuality
A woman admits to a past adulterous affair and having borne a child out of wedlock. She regrets the moral conventions of the time forced her to hide it, and that she did not have enough courage to defy her father and marry her lover.
ADULTERY and FORNICATION in the Bible
SEXUAL LUST outside of marriage—Why does God strongly warn us about this? Answer
Edith appears several times in (by modern standards, rather modest) under garments. The servants get even with the pretentious royal staff through lies, subterfuge, and blackmail. Because the staff is so intolerable, the audience cheers for them. Even the pillar of moral authority, Mr. Carson, admits “they deserved it.” It suggests that the end justifies the means.
From a purely cinematic perspective, there is not much plot. Because it’s a film instead of the usual ten episodes, there is no character development, and it relies heavily on the assumption you know all these people. Most of them get little to do, since the script has no time to flesh out more than few of them. It can be a little convoluted as it tries to explain the British hierarchy… but it really doesn’t matter. All you need to know is, the king’s butler outranks Mr. Carson and nobody likes it. Maggie Smith steals most of the scenes she appears in, but the rest of the cast hold their own, and one special, touching scene between Mary and her grandmother brought a lump to my throat.
One of the stables of the series was the ongoing cruel rivalry between Edith and Mary. I’m delighted to say they have finally grown out of their childish competitiveness and are now treating each other with respect.
It’s a treat to see these characters on the big screen. I had a wonderful time, and from the reactions of the (mostly female) audience, so did everyone else.
See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.
PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.
Positive content includes the development of positive relationships among the family members, such as how Edith and her husband work through some difficulties at the beginning of their marriage. Lord Grantham asks Violet to pray for them. The subtle humour is also tasteful and funny.
Negative content which is disappointing and many Christians will find very offensive: Throughout the series Fellowes has been developing Thomas' character and his journey as a Gay man trying to find himself in the 20's and therefore sending a message to viewers. He's now the butler, although Carson works for him this time during the royal visit. They show him going to a Gay bar and also developing a relationship with another man, showing a passionate kiss between them. Again he is presented as confused and trying to find himself. Although the presentation was probably realistic in how Gay life was for people in that time in history, and I suppose it gives a window what it is like for many people in our society, I found it hard to watch. There is a comment by Thomas that perhaps someday people will understand things they way they do (i.e. how it is to be Gay and the implication that it is an okay lifestyle).
There was very little inappropriate language in the film, although the word “bloody” was used. As a British friend explained to me, it is swearing on Jesus' blood so it is the same as using Christ's name in vain, although in some ways even worse.
The movie has been well received by secular reviewers. It's a good story and shows the continued journey of the Crawley family in a very creative and uplifting way, with the exception of the offensive content mentioned. It leaves you wanting more and the story line certainly left it open for a sequel!
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 4½