Today’s Prayer Focus
Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Incredibles 2

also known as “Los Increíbles 2,” “A hihetetlen család 2.,” “De Utrolige 2,” “Die Unglaublichen 2,” “Fantastikët 2,” “Gli Incredibili 2,” “Inanilmaz Aile 2,” See more »
MPA Rating: PG-Rating (MPA) for action sequences and some brief mild language.

Reviewed by: Jessica D. Lovett

Moral Rating: Average—somewhat offensive
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience: Kids Preteens Family
Genre: Animation Sci-Fi Superhero Action Comedy Family
Length: 1 hr. 58 min.
Year of Release: 2018
USA Release: June 15, 2018 (wide release)
DVD: November 6, 2018
Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Picturesclick photos to ENLARGE Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Relevant Issues

Being a hero by helping others in need

LOVE—What is Christian LOVE? Answer

Family Answers HOME page
Parenting and Family Q&As
Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Copyright, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Featuring Samuel L. JacksonLucius Best / Frozone (voice)
Catherine KeenerEvelyn Deavor (voice)
Sophia Bush … Voyd (voice)
Holly HunterHelen Parr / Elastigirl (voice)
Craig T. NelsonBob Parr / Mr. Incredible (voice)
Jonathan Banks … Rick Dicker (voice)
Brad Bird … Edna Mode (voice)
Bob Odenkirk … Winston Deavor (voice)
Isabella RosselliniAmbassador (voice)
John RatzenbergerThe Underminer (voice)
Sarah Vowell … Violet Parr (voice)
Huck Milner … Dashiell 'Dash' Parr (voice)
Kimberly Adair Clark … Honey (voice)
Toya Turner … Honey Best / FroZone's Wife (voice)
Director Brad BirdBrad Bird—“The Incredibles” (2004), “Ratatouille” (2007), “The Iron Giant” (1999)
Producer Pixar Animation Studios
Walt Disney Pictures
See all »

Prequel: “The Incredibles” (2004)

Without losing a step, “The Incredibles 2” picks up exactly where the hit first film left off… albeit with a slightly darker undertone and a bit more peril than before. Certainly worth the 14-year wait, we catch up with the Incredible family as they fight off the Underminer mole villain terrorizing the city. However, the movie doesn’t stop with the one-dimensional bad guy mole…

There is actually a lot more depth to this sequel than meets the eye. On one hand, it is a colorful, fast-paced kids action movie, but, on the other hand, it presents lots of deep, intellectual questions for adult viewers to mull over. For example, around the dinner table, Bill and Helen (Mr. And Mrs. Incredible) have an argument over what it means to be “good”—is it following the law even if it’s uncomfortable to do so or should a person have the right to disrespect a law that is not respectful of individuals? Both sides of the dilemma are discussed in a way that might be over kids’ heads a bit, but the film’s ever-witty script keeps them engaged. This altercation also brings to mind Acts 5:29 and Romans 13, which both address following God’s law rather than man’s.

Another way that the film explores more complex issues than the usual children’s movie is the way it weaves the narrative of the main antagonist who appears to be on the same page as Winston in his quest to make superheros legally able to practice “superheroing” in public again. Instead of being a flat, predictable character twist, however, the villain’s story is presented in such a way that we feel sorry for them. Based on a family tragedy, the superheros feels that when superheros are in charge, that people become too dependent on them and cease to act wisely or independently—and gives a speech lamenting people’s loss of real experiences that they are sacrificing to screen-time. Later, the harsh reality of this character’s anti-hero philosophy is revealed.

The animation is even more astounding than the first film, from the impeccably 1960s analog spy movie jazzy aesthetic, down to the perfectly lifelike wrinkles and creases on Mr. Incredible’s button up shirt. One major plot hole is that it is “discovered” that baby Jack-Jack also has superhero powers like the rest of the Incredibles, and the whole family is shocked by this, when it’s already been established in the first movie and in the 2005 Pixar short, “Jack-Jack Attack.”

Dash and Violet mature in their ability to understand their personal responsibilities to the family and grow to respect their parent’s wisdom a bit more. In their dealings with each other, Bill and Helen show the kids that it is important to be honest and true to one another, no matter what obstacles are in the way.

Violent moments abound and may not be suitable for younger viewers—near constant fight scenes (martial arts style punching and kicking, primarily, though there is some fire-fight), armed robbery, a character getting fatally shot at point blank range (seen in first person viewpoint), Jack-Jack setting himself on fire, turning into a monster, and shooting lasers from his eyes, cars flying, things exploding, and other action peril, characters hypnotized by strobe-like screens, characters fighting with an ax, a jackhammer, lasers, etc.

The characters have skin-tight costumes, married characters kiss, and Violet has a teen-crush on a classmate. Edna Mode is seen briefly smoking a long-stemmed cigarette, while there are a plethora of scenes with superheros and other people drinking what appears to be alcoholic beverages and talking about needing drinks to relax.

Language—I counted 2 “Oh my G*d” uses, “Oh L*rd” (1), “suc*” (1) and 2 uses each of “h*ll,” “dam*,” and “cr*p,” plus 3 unfinished “what the…”s and an “Ah jeez.” The language did not add anything to the excitement or realism of the movie and that alone is the most disturbing element to me, in that it was completely superfluous.

Depending on the sensitivity of your child, I might skip the short film, “Bao” shown just before the main feature. It is about a Chinese woman who accidentally creates a living dumpling which she raises as her child—Gingerbread Man style—and then, in a moment of anger, eats him. At our showing, there were trailers for “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” “Bumblebee,” “Ralph Breaks the Internet,” “Christopher Robin,” and “Hotel Transylvania 3” which some parents may want to preview on-line before going to the theater.

  • Violence: Mild to Moderate
  • Profane language: Mild to Moderate—“Oh my G*d,” “Oh L*rd,” “h*ll,” “d*mn”
  • Vulgar/Crude language: Mild—“cr*p” (2)
  • Nudity: None
  • Sex: Minor—a kiss
  • Occult: Minor
Editor’s Note: The villain in this movie uses bright flashing lights as a weapon. One scene lasts over 90 seconds with continuous strobe-like light, other scenes last anywhere from 5-30 seconds. If you are among the 3% of people who live with photosensitive epilepsy, or if you have migraines or other photosensitivity issues, you should be cautious about seeing this film.

See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.

Viewer CommentsSend your comments
Positive—Super Hilarious! One of the few sequels as good as, if not better than, the original. We have to see it again because we missed at least half of the movie from everyone—including us—laughing so hard throughout the whole movie. Sold out theater. Audience applauded. Pixar and the cast has surpassed themselves. Great fun! Go see it!
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Tori, age 40+ (USA)
Positive—I saw the first Incredibles when I was only 18 years old, and now I’m 32. It’s been a long time! Disney movies, especially the Pixar ones, always make me smile (and sometimes even tear up, in the case of “Coco”). The short they played before the movie started messing up my mascara (in the best way), and I thought it was so creatively done. Even the short had themes of family in it.

The movie itself wasn’t a tear-jerker, though, but that’s because it’s not that type of movie. Neither of “The Incredibles” movies are. But they’re still appealing to me because they mix adventure and real family issues into a roller coaster of a movie for all ages.

That’s not to say there aren’t scary moments for younger viewers. I’m a grown woman, and I had a hard time with the “mind control” elements of this movie. I’ve always found stories that feature mind control as a major plot device creepy and psychologically disturbing ever since I was a young child, and I still have nightmares about it sometimes.See all »
My Ratings: Moral rating: Good / Moviemaking quality: 5
Becca, age 32 (USA)
Positive—“Incredibles 2” was definitely worth the long wait. It’s funny, well-animated, has a very strong story, and also has a lot of heart. Perhaps a little heavy on exposition in the first third and a few moments of awkwardly goofy, out-of-place dialogue. However, it’s still a whole mess of fun. Brad Bird is definitely one of the best directors Pixar has in tow. He knows how to craft good stories and great, memorable characters.

The film’s message is one of the most refreshing I’ve heard in a Hollywood movie in a long time. That parenting (including single parent-families) is a heroic act indeed. Familial love is praised, and the way the Parr family interacts reminds me more of “family movies” from the 90’s and 2000’s rather than out of today’s PC-driven Hollywood environment. With the exception of a few decisively more modern elements (more likely due to the advances in animation over the years), “Incredibles 2” truly feels like it follows its” 2004 predecessor in tone and style.See all »
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Blake Wilson, age 23 (USA)
Positive—…I have been excited for this movie way before it was announced. I grew up with the first “The Incredibles” as one of my all time favorite movies, and always thought it deserved a sequel. I am currently a 19-year-old guy in college and, yes, I was very excited for this “kids movie.”

I have always appreciated Brad Bird’s decision to creatively create a story of superheroes whose primary focus was their family. We always see superheroes look out for those they love, but never in the family setting in the way “The Incredibles” did. To a big relief to some of you, this focus is not lost in its sequel. In fact, almost every decision Bob/Mr. Incredible and Helen/ElastiGirl make revolves around the rest of the family. This is what I believe to be the core of “The Incredibles” films. Without it, it’d just be another family-friendly superhero movie.See all »
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Jase Brandt, age 19 (USA)
Positive—Fourteen years after writer/director Brad Bird surprised us with “The Incredibles,” he returns with the same main cast and crew for a new adventure that picks up moments after the first one ends. And as stated in a special introduction before the cute short which precedes the main feature, the wait is worth it. The acting, writing, cinematography, directing, etc. is Incredible as usual. Walt Disney Studios and Pixar Animation have outdone themselves again.

Biblically-speaking, there is one use each of “hell” and “damned” and at least two misuses of God’s Name (not from the main cast), along with well executed action sequences which were bloodless, and no sexual content. Some of the violence is slapstick in nature (think Tom And Jerry meet The Three Stooges and Charlie Chaplin), and clearly played for laughs. Children who loved the first film should have no problem with this second installment. Re-watch “The Incredibles” before viewing “Incredibles 2.” You’ll be glad you did. “Incredibles 2” is rated PG.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
D, age 32 (USA)
Positive—This is a more family-friendly superhero movie than the Marvel and DC pictures, but it still has some bad language as noted by the reviewer on this site. I felt that the characters were very stereotyped and predictable in the way they interacted and I was able to guess accurately how the last third of the movie would play out from watching the first two-thirds.

The animation quality is much better than the first Incredibles movie, not that the first movie had bad animation, but because Pixar keeps getting better and better with their animation techniques.See all »
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 3½
E.H., age 26 (USA)
Positive—I was surprised by the negative reviews, this movie is family oriented. We pick up right where the last movie left off. Despite the Incredibles saving metroville from Syndrome, super heroes are still illegal. The family is living in a motel and in need of some money.

Helen gets a job offer to be an advocate for superheroes, which comes with a free house. While she and Bob debate about accepting the job offer, and Bob is upset that Helen is the one going out into action it is understandable why they feel the way they do. Helen and Bob are used to traditional gender roles. I can understand why Bob would feel a sense inadequacy, after all he is used to being the breadwinner and providing for his family. Bob also feels like his wife doesn’t trust him to manage things at home. I can also understand why Helen is reluctant to leave the kids. It’s not that she doesn’t trust Bob to handle the kids, its because she has been a stay at home mom for years, and is used to being at home to meet the childrens” needs.See all »
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Susie, age 27 (USA)
Neutral—The enjoyability of this film was greatly diminished by a peppering of bad language and a few misuses of God’s name. This really sullied an otherwise decent family movie and will most likely prevent us from adding it to our movie collection. The language was completely pointless, and, of course, there are other ways characters can express surprise which do not use the Lord’s lightly and irreverently.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 4
Sellis, age 40 (USA)
Negative—I loved the original movie and was really looking forward to seeing the sequel. Sadly, I did not enjoy this movie at all. The first part of the movie was slow, laborious, and uncomfortable to watch, as the family—particularly the parents—argue and are rude to one another. At one point, later in the movie, the dad is talking to his wife on the phone and is clearly upset that she is successful in her career. He is seething with anger and jealousy, while at the same time lying to her about how things are going at home. In the next moment she is telling him how much she loves him, and he says he loves her, too, but we all know that is not true… how are lying and jealousy acts of love? It was moments like this throughout the entire movie that made us feel uncomfortable.

The drinking, the language, and the violence made this movie not appropriate for a younger audience. I felt this movie was made for adults, not kids. The other “supers” in the movie were not well thought out or interesting. One has the “super-power” of vomiting, which was also hard to watch. One male super hero was very feminine. Jack-Jack was too much, and instead of being a novelty, he became annoying. At one point in the movie, Jack-Jack fights a raccoon, that seems rabid. The scene goes on way too long, and would be frightening for kids, and disturbing for anyone who has ever had a child. The dad at one point is frustrated and tells one of his kids that he “eats lightening and cr*ps thunder.” Was that supposed to be funny?

Technically, the film felt choppy and not well put together. Edna Mode’s character felt thrown in and unnecessary.

I feel that all the funny moments were in the trailer. The words that kept coming to mind as my husband and I discussed the movie was, “too much.” Everything about the movie was too much, like most sequels, too much arguing, too much violence, too much adult content. Everyone we know who has seen this movie had similar feelings… not a family movie, not well done.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Very Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 2
Kay F., age 54 (USA)
Response from reader—This is a response to Kay F: While Bob does act childish and petty at one point in the movie over the success of his wife, once he makes it clear that all he wants is to be a good father and a good superhero, his children make it clear that he is one of the best. It is true, that Bob’s lying and jealousy is sinful, but there is never any doubt of the family’s love for each other.

True the profanity could have been left out, but thankfully it is far and few between. The drinking only lasts one scene, though Helen and Evelyn appear to stop after a bit much, ***SPOILER*** plus Evelyn is the villain and is the one who asks Helen to drink, drinking is presented in a negative light in hindsight. ***END SPOILER*** There is violence in the movie, but it is mainly superheroes trying to stop evil, which is good and biblical. Aside from a few moments, good is called good and evil is called evil. ***SPOILER*** Evelyn is exposed as the evil Screenslaver and the acts of heroism make superheroes legal again. ***END SPOILER***

I laughed numerous times during this movie, particularly the scenes with Jack Jack. While I wish there was more of Edna Mode, she was funny as is in the 10 to 15 minutes of screen time she had. All in all, go see “The Incredibles 2.”
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Peter, age 28 (USA)
Negative—I have to agree with Kay F. I told my husband that I felt they were always arguing. Then to insinuate violence with a gun in a children’s movie is just uncalled for. What is this country allowing Hollywood to “shove” down our throats. Come on America. Wake up. If you are brainwashed by Hollywood movies with this violence, what else can you expect except violence. This is an intentional “breaking” down of our morals to keep us from God. Shame on us for allowing it.

I enjoy the movies of the past “even the past” being 70’s and 80’s films. This is unfortunate, because I always enjoyed movies as a way to unwind and escape stress, but now they are making me stressed.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4
Brenda, age 48 (USA)
Negative—Just watched “The Incredibles 2.” VERY DISAPPOINTED. The movie TRIED to be a colorful, fast-paced kids action movie, while also presenting lots of deep, intellectual questions for adult viewers to mull over. It failed at both.

I found myself bored by the action and almost took a nap. They tried to take on 3 or 4 deep questions instead of just one or two (on the bright side, it was not nearly as preachy as “Cars 2”). IMHO, wait for it to come out on Netflix. Not even worth matinée at the theater.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 2
Jonathan, age 47 (USA)
Negative—I thought the movie was too violent for small children, and the movie was too long. I would not recommend this movie for children under 8. Disappointed in the movie.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 3
Nancy Carter, age 72 (USA)
Negative—I found this movie very long and almost soap opera-ish. It was also eerily disturbing in that little Jack Jack had so many powers he almost seemed possessed. I didn’t find all his superpowers cute, rather, they almost seemed demonic. That didn’t sit well with me.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 5
Suzanne C, age 55 (Canada)
Negative—In short—I enjoyed the first Incredibles for the fun, humorous way it captured so much stuff common to most families, and made an adventure out of it, too. INCREDIBLES 2—Disappointed! It has lost it’s innocent charm of the first, and now depicted a savvy, very “attitude” driven family. Lot’s of ego that isn’t charming or for the sake of showing what can be wrong with our ego that needs to change. Instead the show makes it all seem so fine to be ego driven and sinful flaws as something not to grow out of, but inherent to our “gift.”

Worst: the big butt mother. They put her in a strippers tights and fan her butt in your face the whole movie! That was for actually the usual HOLLYWOOD SEXUAL CONTENT, to seduce all, big and small.

I was all set to buy the movie, based on how I liked the first one, but thought maybe I’ll rent it on AppleTV first. Glad I just rented it. . Not a keeper.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 3
Kelly, age 45 (Canada)
Negative—5 1/2 years after seeing this movie sequel, I still have not forgotten how much of a snoozefest it is compared to the original. I would recommend sticking to the first Incredibles film, even if you’ve watched it more than ten times.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 3
Hannah, age 18 (USA)

PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.