Copyright, Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company
Today’s Prayer Focus
MOVIE REVIEW

Joker: Folie à Deux

also known as “Joker 2,” “Joker 2: Folie À Deux,” “Joker: Folie a Deux,” “Coringa: Delírio a Dois,” “Džokeris: Folie à Deux,” “Guasón 2: Folie à Deux,” See all »
MPA Rating: R-Rating for some strong violence, language throughout, some sexuality, and brief full nudity.

Reviewed by: Pamela Karpelenia
CONTRIBUTOR

Moral Rating: Extremely Offensive
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience: Adults
Genre: Crime Psychological-Thriller Musical Sequel
Length: 2 hr. 18 min.
Year of Release: 2024
USA Release: October 4, 2024 (wide release—4,102 theaters)
DVD: December 17, 2024
Copyright, Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Companyclick photos to ENLARGE Copyright, Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company Copyright, Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company
Relevant Issues
Copyright, Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company

A mentally ill, nihilistic criminal with a clown-inspired persona, formerly an impoverished party clown and aspiring stand-up comedian

Insanity and evil

Manipulative and amoral

Learn about spiritual darkness versus light

Copyright, Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company

Delusions

Music therapist

Featuring Joaquin PhoenixArthur Fleck
Lady GagaHarleen ‘Lee’ Quinzel / Harley Quinn
Catherine KeenerMaryanne Stewart
Zazie BeetzSophie Dumond
Brendan GleesonJackie Sullivan
Steve CooganPaddy Meyers
Ken Leung
Harry Lawtey …Harvey Dent
See all »
Director Todd Phillips
Producer DC Entertainment
BRON Studios [Canada]
See all »
Distributor Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company

“You get what you deserve…”

Prequel: “Joker” (2019)

“Joker: Folie à Deux” takes place shortly after the first film. Arthur Fleck (Joaquin Phoenix) is set to stand up trial for the crimes committed in the previous film. Director Todd Phillips decided to go in a peculiar direction… by adding singing and performative musical elements. This decision along with a warped take on Harley Quinn (Lady Gaga), make this film a difficult watch.

Before describing this disastrous sequel, I will give credit where credit is due. Joaquin Phoenix’s acting is a marvel. From the physical changes he makes, to exhibiting what the Joker is at its core. Despite everything else his acting should be recognized. The same cannot be said for his counterpart Lady Gaga. While her voice is amazing, her acting skills lack what is needed for the Harley Quinn character and it make it difficult to watch. Instead of the audience seeing Harley Quinn come to life, we just see Lady Gaga attempting her version of a Harley Quinn type character, and it just doesn’t wash.

The subject matter in this film is dark. It deals with mental illness, death, abuse trauma and several other aspects. It is important to point out that the objectionable content includes foul language, sexual activity, nudity, violence, blood and explosions. The list is extensive.

The majority of the film takes place in a courtroom setting, and there’s really no redeeming value or biblical truth to draw from it. However, the courtroom setting does make me think of a biblical parallel illustrating humanity’s sin guilt and God’s offer of redemption through Christ. We are all sinners guilty of breaking God’s law. He is a righteous judge, and we all deserve Hell, but because of the atoning sacrifice of His Son Jesus, our debt is paid, if we simply repent and believe in Him. Then we are justified through Christ alone, not because of anything we did but because of what He did on the cross. Christian Answers’ Team Member Ray Comfort uses the courtroom analogy in evangelism, and it fits so well.

Q & A

What is the justice of God?

Despite Joaquin Phoenix’s acting and some stunning cinematography, this film has no redeeming quality, and I cannot recommend it. It does not do the first film justice, and it its ending will upset fans of the genre and confuse new viewers.

  • Violence: Extreme— • Brutal stabbing to death with blood pouring out of victim’s stomach • Killer carves a smile onto victim’ face • Throat slashing • Bashing of heads • Suicide with bloody detail and various verbal references to suicide and self-harm • Mental asylum patients brutally abused by guards • Inmate being strangled to death • Man viciously slammed into walls and beaten • Scene where man’s rape is visually implied • Man shoots himself (with bloody detail) • Man’s head pounded into a urinal • Victim repeatedly hit in the head with a chair with some squirting blood • Victim brutally bashed in the head with a large mallet and his skull is shown caved in • Several murders • Killing several people in a crowd with a gun with blood splatters on the screen • Man is shot in stomach—with blood spraying out • Explosion and following distress with many dead • Arson attack on entire hospital
  • Nudity: Extreme— • Male frontal genital • Male rear (animation) • Naked or almost naked male prisoners • Lady Gaga in bra
  • Sex: Extreme— • Lengthy sex scene with male thrusting in female • Child sexual abuse references • Male stripped down and raped • Male-male kiss • Other kissing
  • Profane language: Very Heavy— • J*sus • G*d • G*d d*mn (2)
  • Vulgar/Crude language: Very Heavy— F-words (50+) and hand gesture, S-words, A**, A**hole, B*tch, Retard
  • Drugs/Alcohol: Moderate — • Heavy smoking throughout • Inmates swallowing compliance drugs
  • Occult: Minor
  • Wokeism: Minor
Q & A

Learn about spiritual darkness versus light

Learn about DISCERNMENT—wisdom in making personal entertainment decisions

cinema tickets. ©  Alexey SmirnovEvery time you buy a movie ticket or buy or rent a video you are in effect casting a vote telling Hollywood, “I’ll pay for that. That’s what I want.” Read our article

See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.


Viewer CommentsSend your comments

PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.

Secular Movie Critics
…Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix sing for no reason in pointless sequel… grows increasingly disturbing, repulsive and strange… [1/4]
Johnny Oleksinski, New York Post
…horrible movie… …so bad it’s almost laughable… this somber, muddled, maudlin film seems to have been made by someone who holds his characters and his audience in contempt.
Dana Stevens, Slate
…When the climax of “Folie à Deux” finally manages to make a single intriguing statement about the platforming of amoral men, it’s far too little too late, and Phillips can’t even execute this without letting the film succumb to utter misery.
Justin Chang, Slant
…it’s insufferable… When you think the ending could not get any worse, it does. “Folie à Deux” closes, to quote T.S. Eliot, not with a bang, but with a whimper. Quelle déception.
Candice Mcmillan, Seattle Refined
…Commits the mortal sin of wasting Lady Gaga… “Joker: Folie à Deux” is Arthur’s movie, and Arthur just isn’t that interesting, despite how much effort Phoenix puts into rendering the character…
Alison Willmore, Vulture (New York Magazine)
It doesn’t work, doesn’t play and doesn’t coalesce into the Big Message movie one and all hoped they’d get out of it. …Humorless, shallow and grim will get you only so far. …When the message is this muddled, all that’s left is to beg the question — “That’s Entertainment?” [1½/4]
Roger Moore, Movie Nation
Strange jukebox musical fails to strike a chord… There isn’t an ounce of chemistry between our leads, and this shaky sequel spends most of its time dancing around in circles. A whole lot of nothing, basically.
Chris Wasser, Irish Independent
…What a waste! …I can never recover the two-hours-plus I consumed watching this wearisome movie. It also throws good actors like Catherine Keener and Brendan Gleeson under the bus. …
Leonard Maltin
…Everything was teed up for “Joker: Folie a Deux” to be a massive success. It ends up being one of the most egregious misfires in recent movie memory. …
Tom Santilli, Movie Show Plus