Reviewed by:
Brian Nigro
CONTRIBUTOR
Moral Rating: | Better than Average |
Moviemaking Quality: |
|
Primary Audience: | Kids Family |
Genre: | Family Sports Comedy |
Length: | 1 hr. 30 min. |
Year of Release: | 1998 |
USA Release: | August 14, 1998 |
USA Release: |
Featuring | Kevin Zegers, Gregory Harrison, Cynthia Stevenson, Nora Dunn, Perry Anzilotti, Robert Costanzo |
Director |
Richard Martin |
Producer | |
Distributor |
The original Air Bud may very well have been a suitable movie for Christian families; it was after all, the only game in town at the time of its 1997 release. Its sequel, however, is clearly formulaic and is completely void of any charm and imagination. I simply cannot imagine any children over 5 or 6 years old enjoying this—not when there’s better, non-condescending material like “Veggie Tales” that at least has characters you care about.
* Editors Note: This review differs significantly with viewers comments as listed below. Please consider these alternative comments before deciding on this movie based on one reviewer’s opinion.
The sequel covers nearly identical material: Josh Framm (KEVIN ZEGERS), still sad about his father’s death, finds a best friend in Buddy, his trusty and loyal golden retriever. For reasons unclear to the audience—either because he wants to impress a junior-high girl we never meet, or because he wants to forget about his Mom’s (CYNTHIA STEVENSON) search for a new husband—Josh tries out for the football team. Buddy, ever trusty and loyal, follows Josh to the field and runs with a football like a frisbee. That’s the gimmick of this movie; the dog’s a quarterback.
Guess what? The gimmick doesn’t work.
Reportedly, the first “Air Bud”, was a true original who really did bob those basketballs into the net. Unbeknownst to the audience, Air Bud died of cancer last year and was replaced by difference four dogs. In other words, there’s a lot of trick photography; and, it’s really dishonest and mean-spirited to present Buddy as something he’s not. That’s lying—and lying to children is especially low.
Take away the dog, and there isn’t much left to this movie. Josh’s Mom attracts the attention of a local veterinarian—gee, how convenient—who just happens to be the same vet Josh takes Buddy to. Parents, please be advised that Josh’s Mom always wears black lipstick, black eyeshadow, and black dresses when going out on dates; also, be advised that there isn’t much of a mother-son relationship. This movie sends a lot of mixed messages to single Christian parents.
And, here’s the trademark of a really bad kid’s movie—if the producers don’t have enough confidence in their story, bring in a couple of bad guys just for laughs. (See “Dennis The Menace” or “Mr. Magoo” for more examples of, “Well, we don’t have a story, but hey, how about these bad guys?”) Parents, take note: animal cruelty is played for amusement by some disposable Boris-and-Natasha type villains (NORA DUNN and PERRY ANZILOTTI), kooky Russians who steal animals for their zoo. At a time when Christian missionaries are bringing the Gospel to the former Soviet Union, it’s really tacky to stereotype Russians as such idiots. It’s not funny.
“Air Bud: Golden Receiver” is rated “G” despite occasional vulgarity and pervasive animal abuse. There is no other violence, profanity, or offensive content. Parents, please don’t let your children “copycat” this movie and throw footballs at the family dog. (And, be forewarned, there’s a scene where football players all pile onto Buddy… a particularly alarming image for a G-rated movie.)
Bottom line: When there’s much better-quality—and moral—family movies like “The Parent Trap” and “Madeline”, why would any Christian parent subject their children to this?
I just came from seeing this movie. I personally liked the movie and I am 32 years old. No it didn’t have a lot of imagination, but hey, life is the same day in and day out. The characters in this movie are sweet. The son never talks back, or yells at his sister. He is always polite to his coach and friends. The little girl also never talks back or calls her brother names. True, Mom, could have dressed more like a lady, but you must remember in the original movie, Mom looked a little more motherly. As for lying to children, I think you’re being rather harsh with these words. Children should always be told that movies are for the most part fantasy. I also saw “Madeline”, and although I thought it was wonderful there were more objectionable things in it than in this movie. Maybe you ought to watch “Air Bud” one more time.