Copyright, Sony Pictures Classics
Today’s Prayer Focus

The Winslow Boy

Reviewed by: Jim Yuill

Moral Rating: Good
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience: Adults Teens
Genre: Drama
Length: 1 hr. 44 min.
Year of Release: 1999
USA Release: April 22, 1999
Copyright, Sony Pictures Classicsclick photos to ENLARGE
Relevant Issues

Accusation of crime by a 14 year old boy

What is JUSTICE? What does the Bible say about it? Answer

Justice of God


Is the FEMINIST MOVEMENT the right answer to the mistreatment that some women endure in this sinful world? Answer

For a follower of Christ, what is LOVE—a feeling, an emotion, or an action?

What is true love and how do you know when you have found it?

Featuring Nigel Hawthorne, Jeremy Northam, Rebecca Pidgeon, Gemma Jones
Director David Mamet
Producer Sarah Green
Winslow Partners Ltd. [England]
Distributor: Sony Pictures. Trademark logo.
Sony Pictures Classics
, a division of Sony Pictures Entertainment

“The Winslow Boy” is a G-rated movie for adults. It’s a fabulous and thought-provoking view of a culture long past. The setting is turn-of-the-century England. The story is about an upper-class family’s fight to restore the reputation of their son, following his expulsion from prep-school.

However, the story is really about characters—fascinating and virtuous characters. For example, the father demonstrates a refreshing display of godly manhood. In him we see love, service, leadership, a well-ordered life, and the respectful submisson of his wife and children.

The primary characters are the adult daughter Catherine (Rebecca Pidgeon) and the family’s attorney Sir Robert Morton (Jeremy Northam). The two work together, seeking to overturn her brother’s expulsion from prep-school.

Through most of the story, Catherine is betrothed to a military officer, yet Sir Robert is clearly a better match. Catherine’s commitment to her fiancé, in spite of Sir Robert’s appeal, is another thread of virtue in the story. In part, “The Winslow Boy” is a very subtle sort of love story—one which reveals only the potential for love.

Omission is an intentional device used throughout the story. Parts of the story are not fully revealed—who did commit the crime of which the son was accused? Exactly what is the “bunny hug”? Does Catherine accept the marriage proposal from Desmond, the family’s other attorney? At one point, Catherine learns a secret and whispers it to her fiancé. For a short while, the audience is left intrigued. The omissions are a powerful device. For several weeks I’ve been imagining the missing details.

There were two aspects of the story which I found objectionable. The character Catherine has a scene of passionate embrace with her fiancé. The display of pre-marital sex is mildly offensive. The greater offense of that scene is from knowing that the actress is, in real life, married to the director of the movie. Acting does not justify adulterous behavior [see note below].

The second objectionable part of the story is Catherine’s vocation of feminist activist. It’s intended to be a display of virtue, but from a Biblical perspective I believe feminism is largely an act of rebellion against God’s intended order. Fortunately, one of Sir Robert’s strengths is his confident opposition to Catherine’s feminist ideals.

Overall, these points of offense are overshadowed by the characters’ virtues and their fight for truth. For a story crafted by worldly men, there is an exceptional degree of common grace. “The Winslow Boy” is intelligent, uplifting and ennobling and has now become one of my favorite films.

Viewer CommentsSend your comments
I totally enjoyed this movie. It is not often we can go to a movie and not squirm in our seats as we are assaulted with unwarranted violence. The subtle humour and sarcasm was wonderful as was the morals portrayed by the characters. Though I found the family members quite unaffectionate with each other, their commitment to the boy was honorable. I personally was not offended by Catherine’s feminist opinions or the brief passionate kiss she shared with her fiance—the man she thought she was going to marry.

My only objection was not seeing the court case in more detail. Hearing about it via the actors did not satisfy my passion for witnessing the heated debates between the lawyers myself. I also found there were many unanswered questions but this made for great conversation after the movie between ourselves and the folks we went with.
C. Monahan, age 48
If a married woman passionately kisses (e.g. bodies pressed together at the shoulders and waist, mouth-to-mouth kiss) a man not her husband—it is adultery. It being on stage does not change the moral nature of the behavior. In Scripture the only place that intimate physical contact is allowed is in marriage, e.g. I Corinthians 7:1, “…it is good for a man not to touch a woman.”

We know from elsewhere in Scripture that intimate touching within marriage is good. So, I understand I Corinthians 7:1 to be cautioning against intimate physical contact outside of marriage.

In the depiction of murder, no one really dies. When an actor passionately kisses another man’s wife on stage, adultery is really committed.

This is what I understand the Scriptures to say. A pressing question regarding that actress' adulterous embrace is, what is the consequence of her sin? Is she guilty and without hope?

Fortunately, the Scriptures not only condemn us for our sin, but they offer us hope. Romans 6:23 “For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” And the means of that free gift is faith and repentance- John 3:16-18, “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.”

God in His kindness saved me 21 years ago, when I was 18. He is a wonderful and very real savior.
Jim Yuill, Reviewer of “The Winslow Boy”
…I recently saw [The Winslow Boy] through a Christian academic camp by the name of Worldview Academy. They actually took us to the only theater in the Twin Cities (MN) metropolitan area that is showing it. The movie is probably the best one I’ve ever seen. It has a very interesting plot, even minor characters parts are developed, and most importantly the movie is presented through a Biblical worldview. Even though there is a lot of dialogue, which may turn away some people, we still need to go and see the movie. Those Christians who usually prefer movies with a bit more action, see it!

Many times us Christians boycott movies and television shows, which is a great thing to do, but when we find a movie like “The Winslow Boy,” we must show the people in the movie industry that we want more movies like it.

What is the srongest thing that speaks to movie makers? MONEY! Therefore ALL Christians should find the nearest movie theater that is showing the movie and go and see it…

Do anything you can to support this movie, this is the time for Christians to show the movie industry what type of movies we are looking for. The bad news is that it was released on April 30th, 1999, so we must truly seize the moment. Carpe Diem!
A.J. Larsen