Reviewed by: Gabriel Mohler
coping with fear
overcoming traumas of the past
loss of a parent and loss of a sibling at a young age
searching for hidden treasure
catacombs of Paris
If a Christian commits suicide, will they go to Heaven? Answer
Perdita Weeks … Scarlett
Ben Feldman … George
Edwin Hodge … Benji
François Civil … Papillon
Marion Lambert … Souxie
Ali Marhyar … Zed
Cosme Castro … La Taupe
Hamid Djavadan … Reza
Théo Cholbi … Gloomy Teenager
Emy Lévy … Tour Guide
Roger Van Hool … Scarlett’s Father
Olivia Csiky Trnka … Strange Young Woman
Hellyette Bess … Strange Old Woman
Aryan Rahimian … Iranian Armed Guard
Samuel Aouizerate … Danny
Kaya Blocksage … Female Curator
|Director:||John Erick Dowdle—“Quarantine” (2008)|
“As Above, So Below” is probably the best found footage movie (in this case, a “self-filmed” approach), I’ve seen yet. But if you’re familiar with frequent offensive content that is the norm for found footage movies, you probably know that doesn’t say too much. I honestly don’t know why, but most found footage movies have a crazy amount of profanity and some amount of inappropriate sexual content. This film has no sexual content, but does have copious profanity, as well as some uncalled-for violence. However, it also has more depth than most films of this fairly new genre. Some reviewers thought it was a success, others didn’t, but one thing is obvious: the creators put effort into being meaningful, not just disturbing. I’ll address this more later.
I never saw “The Blair Witch Project,” which started the genre, but it was “Paranormal Activity” that made found footage popular. Most people (not including myself) found it effectively terrifying, but it was basically a home video version of the clichéd old haunting plot. The sequels seem to be consistently pointless, always crowing evil king. When I reviewed “Devil’s Due,” I didn’t find that one much different. But one of the main things that piqued my interest about “As Above, So Below” was the fact that it wasn’t about a haunted home. It’s an archeology fantasy.
There is no occultism, and the plot is not driven by mystics or New Age ideology, though there are a few references. It’s an underworld fantasy. A young lady named Scarlet leads a team into the ancient catacombs of Paris to search for Flamel’s Philosopher’s Stone, which is rumored to grant immortality. But they unexpectedly stumble upon a long series of passages full of dark mysteries, and they can’t turn back. The further the explorers go, the more uncannily familiar the mysteries become.
This movie shows many things that every real-life archaeologist sees, like catacombs and dead bodies. The dead bodies are pale, but not gruesome, and they’re clothed. One of them is hanged. There are also some cave disasters that wound the characters. The amount of blood is usually kept in moderation and are rarely fatal. Plus, those scenes are usually very hectic, which means the handheld camera is more shaky, making it harder to see detail.
The real scary stuff kicks in at the furthest part of the underworld, where skeletons pop out of the rocks and chase the explorers, inflicting wounds on some. One character has a vision of his past, in which a car burns. We see a person inside, but we don’t see the person burning. The scene I found most scary is when Scarlet is sucked into a pool of blood. It’s more bizarre than gruesome, similar to the elevator scene in “The Shining.”
I counted twice as many F-words as some of the reviews reported—42 (and there may be more). One of them is written. In one scene, a man gets stuck in the rocks and pants a long row of desperate F-words. God’s name is misused 22 times, the names of Jesus (5), d**n misused (2), and “Hell” (3). There are 25 S-words, a**-hole (1) and cr*p (1). Someone also says “you suck” once.
Some other moral concerns include unnecessary illegal activity, including graffiti. One man picks a fight with another to get him to go on the trip.
I was impressed with the special effects in this movie. I’m no filmmaker, but combining special effects with found footage sounds like a hard thing to do. I was even more impressed with the thought-provoking value of the plot. The characters do not fight ghosts or demons, but their own inner demons. The underworld they enter takes them back to several traumatic events of their lives, and they’re haunted by guilt.
In order to survive, they have to cope with their fears and overcome the trauma of the past. Of course redemption, true peace, and eternal life must be asked for from the mercy and power of Christ. We have to trust in Him to protect us. But throughout life, there are many battles we must fight. This film, though dark, did inspire me at the end. It’s one of those films that doesn’t tell you exactly how it wants to make you feel, but rather leaves you thinking about it after you finish it.
I rated this film mostly due to the language, but I think there’s enough uncalled-for violence to earn it that rating, too. I’m hesitant to recommend this film to general viewers. It’s not a good choice for mere entertainment, but mature viewers who are prepared for a very dark take on complicated subjects, and who want to be left with something to think about, may want to give it a watch.
In the end, this film didn’t disappointment my hopes for its potential, and I was refreshed to find that it’s not nearly as offensive as most films like it, but it still contains a fair amount of content issues.Violence: Heavy to extreme / Profanity: Heavy to extreme / Sex/Nudity: Moderate—female club dancers with provocative moves in sexy clothes, 1 long kiss
See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.