Reviewed by: Brian Wolters
CONTRIBUTOR
Moral Rating: | Average |
Moviemaking Quality: |
|
Primary Audience: | Teen to Adult |
Genre: | Sci-Fi |
Length: | 1 hr. 45 min. |
Year of Release: | 2000 |
USA Release: |
Are we alone in the Universe? Answer
What does the Bible say about intelligent life on other planets? Answer
Did a “Martian” meteorite proven the existence of ET? Answer
Questions and Answers about The Origin of Life
Featuring | Don Cheadle, Tim Robbins, Jerry O’Connell, Kim Delaney, Elise Neal |
Director |
Brian De Palma |
Producer | Story Musgrave, Tom Jacobson |
Distributor |
As a science fiction fan, I especially enjoy films that deal with current or near-future explorations into space. When I first heard of “Mission to Mars,” I was excited with the possibilities of a story surrounding our first mission to the red planet. But after viewing “Mission to Mars,” I have to say that it was one of the few movies I have ever wanted to walk out from. From opening to ending, it is filled with plot holes, bad acting, even worse dialog and illogical direction.
I was expecting a “goose bump” inducing scene showing our first landing and steps on Mars. We don’t get it. Once taken to Mars, we are introduced to a Mars rover, and we then see humans are already there stumbling onto a mysterious phenomenon. (The movie really pushes the “PG” rating in a few death scenes early on.) There is almost no sense of mystery in the film and it only gets worse.
The acting is stiff and forced. While there is a collection of good actors, the dialogue is so horrendous that it elicits unintentional laughter. One character, intended to be the comic relief, ends up being laughed at not because of his humor, but because his dialogue is so bad.
The direction of “Mission to Mars” is probably the worst aspect. Despite an interesting sequence involving dancing in “zero g,” everything else unintentionally gives the impression that everyone in the film are idiots. For example, take the scene where the first crew finds the mysterious object on Mars. The wind picks up and they just stand there—not in awe or fright, but for no visible reason at all. Maybe just to be targets to die early on. One crew member shields his face from the sand. With a helmet on?
Another scene shows us a crew member that sacrifices their own self to save others. I don’t want to give it away, but the method they use is so illogical and badly directed, that you don’t know how to react. They show the scene and then give us 3-4 long shots of the dead body. This scene disturbed my wife because it was unexpected and extremely awkward. She and I both felt that it wasn’t necessary to further the film.
When we finally get to see some “aliens,” it is too late. And while that moment could have been an emotional and uplifting scene, it is instead reminiscent of “Close Encounters”, “Contact” and “The Abyss” all mixed into one.
As far as moral content, there are a few moments of bad language and some very light “sensual” moments, but nothing terribly offensive in those areas. The idea of someone killing themselves to save others sets a bad example and is not a good illustration of self-sacrifice. The film hints that Mars is the origin of life on Earth and may influence those who are not Biblically sound. Those who are easily influenced by this kind of material may want to stay away from this picture.
Overall, I can’t recommend this film because it is a disaster in screen writing and direction. There is a scene where an “alien being” sheds a tear. Being in a film like this, I don’t blame them. I give this film a D-.
Followers of Christ should alert about this film’s promotion of ANCIENT ALIENS or ANCIENT ASTRONAUTS theory, because this is an issue that is truly deceiving a very great number of people, partly because it is presented as scientific and archaeological (both false claims). At its base, it is a lie being used by godless people to “scientifically” explain away Biblical miracles and events—and God Himself.
This tactic started with atheist author H.P. Lovecraft. Years later, this pseudo-scientific idea was famously promoted by Erich von Däniken (Chariots of the Gods) and others. The Director of this film was inspired by von Däniken, and says so. This idea has particularly been used by some whose worldviews are New Age or Evolutionism/Atheism (or both).
The claim is that extraterrestrials with advanced technology came to Earth in ancient times and were mistaken for gods, angels and supernatural activity—and that out of these encounters with naive and unsophisticated humans (who misunderstood what they witnessed), humans began to worship these aliens—and the world’s religions (including Christianity) are the end result.
I have researched these claims in considerable depth, including attending von Däniken lectures. I am in agreement with many other researchers, the so-called evidence for this fantasy is filled with foolish errors and serious outright lies and deceptions.
Nonetheless, many sci-fi books, movies and TV shows have eagerly used and promoted what is essentially a dangerous Atheist-inspired worldview.
What difference does it make? When accepted, this pseudo-science leads people directly away from Biblical truth about Earth’s Creation, mankind’s place in God’s plan, Earth’s history of wicked rebellion against the Creator, and the record of His judgments. Inherent in this worldview is rejection of belief in God and the Bible. People are less likely to perceive their spiritually bankrupt state before God and are more unlikely to want—or listen to—the Gospel.
Entertainment dramas that use the ancient extraterrestrial encounters fantasy and thus promote it some extent…
If nothing else, the mere CONSTANT REPETITION of this view of history in entertainment media is causing it to become embedded in the minds of billions of people, making it somehow seem to them less ludicrous than it really is. Discerning Christians know that we and God have an Enemy who is the father of lies who seeks to deceive the whole world.
Some “creative evolutionists” believe life arose by creation, but say that the first life-form contained the information to give rise to all other forms (versions of this belief include thinking of the universe or the DNA code as God). “Mission to Mars” seems to teach a version of this idea, since the Martians predicted the structure of human DNA a billion years before we evolved. Also, the astronauts talk about a model of a tiny piece of human DNA as though it were a model of an almost-complete set of human chromosomes. Just sloppy science, or an implication that the whole is contained in every part?
Many authorities admit that the major goal of the real-world push to explore Mars isn’t something practical like mining, but the search for life. An astronaut in Gregory Benford’s well-researched 1999 novel “The Martian Race” says that ever since evolution and long-age geology “killed God” in the mid-19th century, we’ve felt alone in the universe; and the Mars program is our attempt not to be alone any more.
Think of the umpteen billions we could save on space exploration (and on the giant antenna arrays searching for extraterrestrial radio signals) if we’d just replace evolution with good science.
As a science-degreed Bible-believer who accepts the six-day creation of Genesis, I read and watch Sci-fi for escapist entertainment (and to keep up with the latest propaganda), not to add meaning to my life. I’m complete in Jesus (Col. 2:9,10). “Keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called.” (1 Tim. 6:20 KJV)
My Ratings: [2½/2½]