Today’s Prayer Focus
Copyright, Warner Bros.

Blade Runner 2049

also known as “Blade Runner 2,” “Begantis skustuvo asmenimis 2049,” “Istrebljivač 2,” See more »
MPA Rating: R-Rating (MPA) for violence, some sexuality, nudity and language.

Reviewed by: Raphael Vera

Moral Rating: Very Offensive!
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience: Adults
Genre: Sci-Fi Thriller Sequel 3D IMAX
Length: 2 hr. 43 min.
Year of Release: 2017
USA Release: October 6, 2017 (wide—4,058 theaters)
DVD: January 16, 2018
Copyright, Warner photos to ENLARGE Copyright, Warner Bros. Copyright, Warner Bros. Copyright, Warner Bros. Copyright, Warner Bros.
Relevant Issues
Copyright, Warner Bros.

What does God says about PERVERSITY? Answer


Copyright, Warner Bros.

Evidence of widespread sexual lust in society / What is LASCIVIOUSNESS? Answer

Copyright, Warner Bros.

FILM VIOLENCE—How does viewing violence in movies affect families? Answer

Copyright, Warner Bros.


About despair, fear and hope

Click here to watch THE HOPE on-line!
Discover God’s promise for all people—told beautifully and clearly from the beginning. Discover The HOPE! Watch it on Christian Answers—full-length motion picture.
Copyright, Warner Bros.

THE FEAR OF THE LORD—What is it? Why is it exceedingly important? Answer

Mocking the Creator of life and the universe

Copyright, Warner Bros.
Featuring Ryan Gosling'K'
Harrison FordRick Deckard
Edward James OlmosGaff
Jared LetoNiander Wallace
Robin WrightLieutenant Joshi
Dave Bautista … Sapper Morton
Ana de Armas … Joi
Mackenzie Davis … Mariette
Lennie James … Mister Cotton
See all »
Director Denis Villeneuve — “Sicario,” “Prisoners”
Producer Yale Badik
Dana Belcastro
See all »
Distributor: Warner Brothers Pictures. Trademark logo.
Warner Bros. Pictures
, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company

a bleak and depraved world where high-tech fuels even greater spiritual darkness, immorality, perversity, and violence

In the near future, mankind has come to rely on lifelike androids—replicants—to perform the more dangerous and undesirable tasks that humans would rather avoid. In the original 1982 film, “Blade Runner” which was set in 2019, Officer Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) was given the job of hunting down 6 rogue replicants that had gone on a killing spree. In the course of that film, he eventually came to feel something more for one replicant in particular and an otherwise bleak film ended on a somewhat positive note.

Now, 30-years later, replicants have been fully integrated into society. Blade Runners still exist to run down older, rogue models that are in hiding, and the force now even employs a replicant, “K” (Ryan Gosling), to track them down. Officer K finds and defeats one at the outset of the film, only to discover a person’s bones hidden on the replicant’s property.

The examined remains suggest that a replicant may have actually given birth, although that should be patently impossible. If a replicant is able to get pregnant should they now consider them human? And whatever happened to the child? This discovery is a threat to society that must remain hidden and so Lieutenant Joshi (Robin Wright) assigns K the job of finding and destroying the replicant child.

Niander Wallace (Jared Leto), the robotics genius who took over the replicant business after the previous owner was killed, shares a vested interest in finding the child—not destroying it—and so he tasks a female replicant, Luv (Sylvia Hoeks), to keep tabs on Officer K, assist when possible and kill whoever gets in the way.

None of this is known by Officer K, who ‘lives’ a quiet life in his downtime with his holographic companion Joi (Ana de Armas), who he interacts with as though she is a real confidant and girlfriend, the main difference being that they cannot touch. Together, they set out to find the child, but, as to what Officer K will do if that day comes, even he is not sure.

“Blade Runner 2049” is as visually stunning as its predecessor and, in homage, mimics much of the style and tone of the original. This is not necessarily a good thing. What sets this sequel apart is how it undertakes an even deeper dive into a society that has elevated perversity into the norm, while taking a hard look at the implications of procreating replicants. I respect the script’s bent towards real science fiction, and, make no mistake, that’s what “Blade Runner 2049” is, but it is a shame that the director chose to frame the narrative within some very unsavory themes, visuals and gruesome violence.

Objectionable content

Violence: Extreme. People are shot and killed, sometimes through the head, covered or crushed by debris, bombed by missiles, stabbed, a person’s hand is tortuously crushed with glass, a spine is broken over a man’s knee, and in one of the more grisly scenes a ‘newborn’ android, in the form of a nude adult female, is maliciously sliced open by Wallace and bleeds to death.

Disturbing imagery, along the same lines, include removed eyeballs, bloody bodies, and skeletal remains. The replicant Luv’s actions are as brutal as they are quick and, in one instance, she shoots someone in the head without a second’s hesitation when she senses Wallace’s displeasure. Later a character is held under water until fully drowned.

Additionally, the violence is often perpetrated so quickly that the audience does not have time to turn away. The extremely violent content is not appropriate for adults, let alone teens.

Sex/Nudity: Very Heavy. Nudity and sexual imagery is prevalent throughout the film. Officer K is in the shower and nudity is implied but not seen, and although Joi is a hologram, she changes what she wears to please K, and her clothing ranges from demure housewife to casual lingerie wear. However, as Joi is also a best-selling, popular hologram companion, one can see building-sized versions of Joi fully nude projected in the streets in order to entice prospective buyers. Replicant prostitutes openly work the crowds looking for business, and when walking through one of their operations the sounds of sex are clearly heard, and one can see gyrating silhouettes behind frosted glass walls. Naked inactive androids, including frontal male nudity, are seen within glass enclosures and bizarrely oversized statues of naked women in various poses occupy the landscape of an abandoned city.

Lastly, K’s holographic girlfriend Joi hires a replicant prostitute in order to finally have sex with Officer K, and she does so by overlaying her programming (or syncing) with the replicant. Although the sex act is not shown, the implication and lead up is still there—and confirmed when she wakes up naked in his bed. Very inappropriate sexual themes and foully presented nudity throughout make this highly unsuitable for teens and not at all edifying for adults.

There is also subtle political gamesmanship present in this film that bears mentioning. An often promoted message in today’s media is that substitutes for God’s ordained plan are often better than the original. We have heard in the media how a Gay person is more a ‘man’ than most, or how a transgender ‘woman,’ in reality a man with gender dysphoria, is likewise “more woman than the rest” and who can escape the promulgation of the conjoined words ‘Gay’ with ‘marriage.’ This is no accidental turn of phrase, and the supposition continues here when a character says that the replicants are becoming “more human than humans.”

Language: Heavy. Due to long visual stretches throughout, the film is light on dialog, so when foul language is used it makes a stronger and more profound impact. The Lord’s name is taken in vain once by the hero (G**d**n). While curses ranged from the f-word (7), sh** (3, including bullsh*t), “What the h*ll,” bast*** (1) and a euphemism for male genitals (pr***) is used once. The bulk of the curses come from the humans. Officer K himself does not curse at all, until his quest for the child takes an emotional turn almost suggesting that to be more human one must be profane.


Most films will have characters that audiences can either despise or applaud, based on traits that have been given to us through Holy Scripture. “Blade Runner 2049” is no exception and has several examples that can be held up for biblical analysis including: modesty, fornication and idolatry.

Modesty—The film’s pervasive sexual immorality, lust and nudity falls far short of God’s desire for us to live holy lives unto our Creator.

“Likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control…” —1 Timothy 2:9-10

Fornication—Aside from the near constant bombardment of ‘sex for sale’ on the streets, the film presents the use of a prostitute as a positive thing that will bring Joi and Officer K together. The Word of God could not be any clearer on this subject.

“For the lips of a forbidden woman drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil, but in the end she is bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword. Her feet go down to death; her steps follow the path to Sheol…” —Proverbs 5:3-5

“For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality; that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor…” —1 Thessalonians 4:3-4

Idolatry—Niander Wallace has assumed the place of God when he speaks of ‘making angels,’ or creating replicants that can one day reproduce. A replicant likewise refers to the miracle of childbirth when it is a man-made one (replicant). One can also sense the director’s dark vision when Wallace suggests, “We can storm Eden and take it back,” via his creations, naturally. The Bible teaches that life originated by the Word of God, and it is He alone who deserves our worship.

“Then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature.” —Genesis 2:7

“They changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator…” —Romans 1:25

“Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I [am] the first, and I [am] the last; and beside me [there is] no God.” —Isaiah 44:6

Ryan Gosling (Officer K) does his stoic best in the title character, and, together with Ana de Armas (Joi), they are the primary engines propelling the story forward. Unfortunately, the sometimes tedious pacing and minimalist dialog detracts from an otherwise sometimes fascinating adventure.

The strength of “Blade Runner 2049” is that it’s an intriguing Science-Fiction tale, however, one that sadly includes a morass of depraved, godless and perverse characters, so much so that I cannot with conscience recommend this film on either a secular or spiritual level, the latter needing to be our primary concern lest our souls be scarred. How better the other choice that our Lord God wishes for us.

“Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things.” —Philippians 4:8

  • Violence: Extreme
  • Profanity/Vulgarity: Heavy
  • Sex/Nudity: Very Heavy

Viewer CommentsSend your comments
Positive—I saw this film on an IMAX screen and have to say it took my breath away. This is a stunning movie and filmed beautifully. The acting was pretty good (with an great performance from Harrison Ford I thought) and the story intriguing. The story of what makes us human has been done many times before, but this take still felt fresh. There was a fair amount of violence and bad language (not to mention nudity), but it was all pretty much in context, and I didn’t find any of it offensive or unnecessary. I would not recommend this film for minors though. I really do recommend this movie, and I recommend seeing it on a huge screen. …
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Dez, age 40 (United Kingdom)
Positive—My biggest takeaway from “Blade Runner 2049” was a deep feeling of gratitude to God for my humanity and my soul. I disagree that the movie inferred that the replicants’ “humanity” was more valid than that of biological humans. If anything, I felt that the machines’ desperate desire to be human declared the praiseworthiness of God’s creation.

To be clear, I would only recommend this for adults. The violence and sexual elements would not be appropriate for a minor. However, I didn’t feel that the movie was celebrating the perversity that it displays. In fact, the protagonist finds emptiness in these things, and he is only shown to discover fulfillment when he is striving to be more human in a self-sacrificing spirit—thus the film again lauds the Lord’s handiwork as superior to mankind’s human-like machines.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Madeline, age (USA)
Positive—“Blade Runner 2049” is a fantastic film that will provoke a lot of debate. The main character, K, played by Ryan Gosling goes on an existential search much like the one experienced by many on their journey to Christianity: the need to know that he matters, that his life has value and meaning. I don’t want to get into spoilers, but what he discovers subverts your typical movie clichés and packs a powerful punch.

The violence is necessarily graphic, but never enjoys or revels in it. The sexual content is what has clearly put some people off, and it clearly isn’t suitable for people underage, but I think that what the director was showing was the emptiness of consumerism and criticising the attitude towards women held in society. One of the characters is a hologram who is programmed and exists solely to pleasure the main character, and the realisation of the emptiness of it is a heartbreakingly stark scene.

On a technical level it’s perfect, although the pacing might be a little too slow for some viewers. The performances are fantastic, the score is great and the cinematography is so beautiful that every frame could be a painting.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Simon, age 47 (United Kingdom)
Positive—Stunning visuals dominate this sequel to the dystopian science fiction classic from 1982. It is even darker than the original in depicting a world undone by war, climate change and marketing-crazed consumer capitalism. Unfortunately the plot is very hard to make sense of, and it is hard to know what stunning visual you are at and why.

In one sequence, the film’s early focus on the new generation “Blade Runner” K gets an almost Biblical, “I must decrease so he can increase” quality as Harrison Ford suddenly appears as his old character 30 some years later. Like in old timers in the Star Wars sequels, Ford is mostly hiding out from the new conflict. K and Ford first meet, then fight and then drink.See all »
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Stanley Hirtle, age 73 (USA)
Positive—I want to comment specifically about the scene where K interacts with the giant naked advertisement of Joi. Some people think that the nudity is there for cheap titillation but, in actuality, it’s there to hammer home the point of the scene. The advertisement says some phrases that K's now destroyed copy of the program said to him earlier in the film. This is what makes him realize that the relationship that he thought he had with Joi was all a lie. She was just a product all along that, as the advertisement itself says, “tells you what you want to hear.” The nudity only reinforces this and highlights the crass commercialized nature of the product that was sold to him. K is no different from the viewer of pornography, chasing a fantasy and thinking its real. K, who already found out that he isn't anything special, hits rock bottom and realizes that everything from his memories to his relationship with Joi is a lie. You see K look at his gun briefly (perhaps contemplating suicide), but he ultimately decides to do something positive by rescuing Deckard and reuniting him with his daughter. That's how he proves that he has some measure of humanity.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Good / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Raphael , age 32 (Canada)
Neutral—While the movie making quality was good, the movie had way too much nudity. The nudity included many naked women including a larger than life hologram of a naked woman. There was also a scene that suggested that the main character had sex outside of marriage with a real woman that was surrounded by a hologram of a woman (the hologram was over the woman, but you could sort of see both at the same time).

There was also a lot of violence. There were multiple stabbings, gouging, and a forced drowning. One of the characters makes some biblical references. The biblical references included the story of Rachel becoming pregnant and talk of angels. There was also discussion of people having souls and the replicants not having souls, since they were man-made.

I watch many science fiction and action films and felt that the movie fit in with the current science fiction action movies with great special effects and interesting story line.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Rose, age 38 (USA)
Neutral—This movie is very hard to do a review about because there’s two sides to rating it. Movie quality wise I’d give it a 9.5 out of 10. Story, music, sound, acting, CGI… etc. were all amazing. It’s very much like the first movie in terms of groundbreaking quality. Granted, if you don’t like a lot of talking, long shots of a person displaying an emotion and a nearly 3 hour movie, this may not be for you.

Now, while I am glad it didn’t have much swearing, it did have some blood and violence. And the biggest issue of all was nudity. And by nudity I mean there had to be at least 5 or 6 times when you saw a woman’s breast and nipples showing fully in front of you. Just once maybe I can deal with it. But so many times really made it awkward. Also, there are statues, as with the first movie, of naked stone women in sexual looking positions. Including two that are essentially mimicking oral sex. They may be just statues, but its obvious what they are supposed to be doing. See all »
My Ratings: Moral rating: Very Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 5
Matt S, age 36 (USA)
Negative—Produced by Ridley Scott—who is no friend to Christians. Directed by Denis Villeneuve (Dune, Arrival). The production value is superb and very few films could stand up to the visual experience this movie offers. It’s a Hollywood masterpiece. Reread that last statement. The music is faithful to the original 1982 Vangelis production which was a big part of the tone of the film. And a side note is the original musician billed for the score was the Icelandic artist Jóhann Jóhannsson who was pulled from the film by Villeneuve and replaced by Hans Zimmerman, likely due to the extremely dark tone of Jóhannsson’s work applied to this film. Jóhannsson later died of a drug overdose.

From a Christian standpoint there is no redeeming value. The core of the film is about a synthetic human who hopes he is not synthetic and thus has a soul. The confounding part of this dilemma is the absence of what it means to have a soul. Violence is throughout, but there is an extremely disturbing scene in the film of a casual slaughter of a newly “birthed” synthetic by its creator-god. In this film the creator-god is man, and man creates his image in the synthetic humans. Man is evil, and synthetics are good. This tone is throughout the film. This same theme was throughout the original 1982 version as well.

It’s a fascinating journey of hopelessness from the point of view of a synthetic bond-slave but it will do its best to pull you away from Christ and back into the world.

As a Christian—stay away.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Very Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 5
Peter C., age (USA)

PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.

Movie Critics
…one of the most deeply philosophical and challenging sci-fi films of all time, a movie that never holds your hand as it spirals the viewer through its gorgeous funhouse of the human soul… [3½/4]
Brian Tallerico,
…this film is itself a work of corporate efficiency, designed to flatter our feelings of specialness so as to distract us from our own alienation, which is also both enabled and salved by technology. …Villeneuve knows how to tell a story, though screenwriters Hampton Fancher and Michael Green haven’t furnished him with much of one in this case. …[2/4]
Chuck Bowen, Slant
…It’s perhaps the central irony of “Blade Runner 2049,” which depicts a future where humans have gone astray, while new-and-improved androids know precisely what they want: to be human. …Villeneuve doesn’t deal in the conventional idea of suspense, where a difficult goal must be achieved on an imminent deadline; rather, he operates via a kind of dramatic suspension, in which he challenges attention-deficit audiences to adapt to his unnaturally attenuated pace. …
Peter Debruge, Variety
…a very long film… didn’t offer much to the uninitiated…
Alice Vincent,The Telegraph [UK]
…How on earth did Denis Villeneuve convince Warner Brothers to let him make a gigantic, foreboding tone poem and dress it up as a “Blade Runner” sequel? …
Chris Evangelista, Slash Film
…little conventional female appeal… It was too long. …not remotely kid-friendly. …
Scott Mendelson, Forbes
…If you have two X chromosomes, or know and like someone who does, “Blade Runner 2049” may not be the movie for you. …[2/4]
Sara Stewart, New York Post
…By virtually every measure, it succeeds… It may seem premature to ascribe the word ‘masterpiece’ to the legacyquel of a heady sci-fi head-scratcher from the ‘80s, but its audacity and formal perfection—not to mention its thematic weight – leave no other alternative.
Clint Worthington, Consequence of Sound
…it somehow keeps losing its way. The picture’s moodiness is excessively manicured; this thing is gritty only in a premeditated way. Mostly, it feels like a capacious handbag, designed with perhaps too many extra compartments to hold every cool visual idea Villeneuve can dream up. …
Stephanie Zacharek, Time